1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Sergio039 [100]
3 years ago
9

Please help with these questions!

Social Studies
1 answer:
Zolol [24]3 years ago
3 0
4.landform

6.absolute location

8.idk that one sorry
You might be interested in
What are some pros and cons about the 19th amendment
MaRussiya [10]

Gender inequality is so severe in the past that a proposal to add the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) to the United States constitution has to be made. It was introduced in Congress in 1923, but was only approved by 35 States 50 years later. But because 38 States has to approve the amendment to make it a law, its addition to the constitution remains a hot, controversial issue to this day.

Why are some states opposed to the Equal Rights Amendment when the population is a mix of male and female? Perhaps they are not in favor of the amendment’s context.

“Equality of rights under the law shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.”

It was designed to ensure equal rights for women. It also specifies that only the Congress will have the power to impose the provisions of the ERA, and two years after its ratification, the amendment will take effect.  

The Equal Rights Amendment was written by Alice Paul in 1923, just years after women were granted the right to vote by the 19th amendment. She was the founder of the National Woman’s Party and a suffragist leader. Since its introduction until 1972, the ERA was brought up in almost every session, but falls short by 3 states so it can be put into the Constitution. What would it mean if the Equal Rights Amendment becomes a law? What are its pros and cons?

List of Pros of Equal Rights Amendment

1. Abolition of gender discriminating laws

Once the ERA becomes part of the Constitution, all federal laws and family court laws that discriminate on account of sex would be completely abolished. Gender favoritism would become illegal as well as any prejudice shown based on gender. Although it won’t stop people from holding specific views, it will minimize gender discrimination. It would also be easy to take legal action against anyone who violates the law.

2. Equal rights are made for all

The US Constitution does not guarantee that citizens’ rights are protected and equally held by everyone. But with the addition of the ERA, everyone will now have legal civil, human, and diplomatic rights from any and all types of prejudice.

It would also clarify the legal standard for court rulings on cases related to gender discrimination, which is currently absent. At present, nearly everything women receive has to go through the courts where officials have an opportunity to use ‘protective laws’ to place women in their rightful place in society, effectively ending further arguments. But when the ERA is passed, all forms of gender discrimination will no longer be tolerated and legal rulings will have a set standard.

3. Women’s rights will have legal basis

The ERA will effectively put an end to the discussion or debate regarding gender equality. Men and women will be finally recognized as equals, sparing women from the need to fight for their standing in the society and to have level footing with men. Women will be able to get credit or run a business without asking for her husband’s consent. She will be able to take advantage of medical care, travel, vocational training and a wider range of associations.


5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The tendency to assume that one's culture and way of life are superior to all others is termed
Zigmanuir [339]
Hm, I think the question here calls for "d", although d would be better defined as a focus on one's own culture, and ignoring other cultures, or seeing other cultures through the lense of own culture.

In a way, prejudice could be a good lead, but only if it said "prejudice towards all other cultures" which is not really feasible (one can't know all other cultures).

so, still, d is best, although there can be ethnocentrism without feeling superior
3 0
3 years ago
A _____________ is a group of "people with a shared identity and culture (a nation) who possess their own territory and state go
Licemer1 [7]
<span>A nation-state is a group of "people with a shared identity and culture (a nation) who possess their own territory and state government, or a state-level political system that contains all and only members of one nation."
</span>It is a form of political organization with one great majority. The two word nation and state describe the following: a<span> state is apolitical and geopolitical entity, while a nation is a cultural and ethnic one.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements about cognitive mapping is correct?
mina [271]

Answer:

The research on cognitive mapping is generally high in ecological validity.

7 0
2 years ago
Discuss briefly the effects of not having good governance ​
mel-nik [20]

Simply put, governance is the exercise of control. Currently, it depends on the topic at hand. If we define it on a personal level, it means that a person is unable to regulate themselves.

But typically it pertains to governing a state (state means any organised territory). Now, while the idea of bad governance is straightforward, the causes that give rise to it are far too nuanced. Let's examine some of the underlying reasons now:

  • a lack of probity, integrity, and ethics.
  • corruption in the system is widespread. Favoritism, theft, bribery, and other forms of corruption are all examples of corruption.
  • Lack of technology because people are unwilling to adopt it.
  • hesitation in choosing an impartial Ombudsman.

People frequently avoid paying taxes to the government because they have little faith in its apparatus. This frequently results in the government spending less on development and adding to the strain on tax payers by giving them fewer resources to survive on. Only by educating the general community about ethical issues can this vicious cycle be broken.

A society's government can be viewed as a whole. A society's political environment would look the same if its mentality encouraged corruption.

8 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • A new settlement that keeps close ties to its homeland
    13·2 answers
  • To help you understand your notes better, you could _____. A. zone out B. rewrite them C. redistribute them D. rezone them
    10·2 answers
  • Freud stressed the importance of ________.
    6·2 answers
  • The purpose of having a cursory inspection of the victim's personal effects and clothing is to ________.
    13·2 answers
  • What’s the Difference Between a Bunny, a Rabbit and a Hare?
    5·1 answer
  • I need help with number 4
    12·2 answers
  • Researchers demonstrated that the hippocampus functions in memory processing by creating lesions in the hippocampi of rats, whic
    12·1 answer
  • Biden’s White House team and Cabinet secretaries I need a very detailed paragraph about this
    10·1 answer
  • do you still vary in terms of what is acceptable or what has been practiced nowadays here in our locality?why?​
    10·1 answer
  • Why does Ohio have more electors in the electoral college process than Virginia?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!