Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Given points:</u>
- A(-1, -9) and M(0.5, -2.5)
Let the coordinates of B are (x, y)
<u>Use midpoint formula to determine the point B:</u>
- 0.5 = (- 1 + x)/2 ⇒ 1 = -1 + x ⇒ x = 1 + 1 = 2
- -2.5 = (-9 + y)/2 ⇒ -5 = -9 + y ⇒ y = -5 + 9 = 4
I spent a lil time on it but I’ll let you know in a lil but if I have the answer:)
Answer:
a
The estimate is 
b
Method B this is because the faulty breaks are less
Step-by-step explanation:
The number of microchips broken in method A is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The number of microchips broken in method B is 
The number of faulty breaks of method A is 
The proportion of the faulty breaks to the total breaks in method A is


The proportion of the faulty to the total breaks in method B is

For this estimation the standard error is

substituting values


The z-values of confidence coefficient of 0.95 from the z-table is

The difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is mathematically represented as
![K = [p_1 - p_2 ] \pm z_{0.95} * SE](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5Bp_1%20-%20p_2%20%5D%20%5Cpm%20z_%7B0.95%7D%20%2A%20SE)
substituting values
![K = [0.08 - 0.07 ] \pm 1.96 *0.0186](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=K%20%3D%20%5B0.08%20-%200.07%20%5D%20%5Cpm%201.96%20%2A0.0186)

The interval of the difference between proportions of improperly broken microchips for the two breaking methods is

Answer: 180
Step-by-step explanation: 30 x 6= 180