Answer:
B. No. The product of two fractions is the product of the numerators divided by the product of the denominators.
Step-by-step explanation:
For A: A is clearly false because you can multiply any fraction and it doesnt matter what the denominator is.
For B: The first part is correct, which is that to multiply two fractions, they dont have to have like/common denominators, the explanation part is also correct. When we multiply we multiply the numerator to the numerator and the denominator to the denominator.
For C: C is false because the first part says yes and we know that you can multiply any 2 fractions regardless of denominators.
For D: For D the first part is correct however, the explanation section is false you dont multiply the numerator to the denominator.
For E: You don't have to find the equivalent fraction to multiply because you can do that afterward.
I hope this helps, have a blessed day! :D
D.) y= 0.3x
This is because slope is change in y over change in x, so we get 3/10 which is equivalent to 0.3
I don't understand your question
<span />
Answer:
n = 1 second formula
n = 0 first formula
Step-by-step explanation:
I answer this in the other question you put, here it is again.
This is easy to get. We know the sequence cause it follows a pattern of 8, so let's try some values of n from 1 to 4, to get those numbers with the first formula:
n = 1,2,3,4
f(1) = 8(1) + 2 = 10
f(2) = 8(2) + 2 = 18
f(3) = 8(3) + 2 = 26
f(4) = 8(4) + 2 = 34
As you can see, with the first formula, the first term is 10, and not 2. The only way to get 2 with n = 1 is with the second formula:
f(1) = 8(1) - 6 = 2
f(2) = 8(2) - 6 = 10
f(3) = 8(3) - 6 = 18
f(4) = 8(4) - 6 = 26
With n = 1, the second formula was better and correct.
The first formula could be right only beggining with n = 0. Here is the proof:
f(0) = 8(0) + 2 = 2
Hey there! :D
21= 2x-6+x
21=3x-6
27=3x
x=9
The smaller number is 9.
The larger number is:
9*2= 18 18-6= 12
The larger number is 12.
I hope this helps!
~kaikers
