Answer:
True
Explanation:
The reason is that the business would only recruit extra employees if the demand of the product is increasing which means that the consumer are spending more on purchasing goods and services which would increase the domestic production that is responsible in increase in GDP of the country. So it is true that increased customer spending increases the domestic production which increase the GDP of the country.
The increase of the new SUV from $24,000 to $26,000 after the agreement illustrates a low-balling technique.
<h3>What is a low-balling technique?</h3>
This is a tactics used when the persuader gets a person to commit to a low offer that they have no intention of keeping and then, the price is suddenly increased.
Hence, the increase of the new SUV from $24,000 to $26,000 after the agreement illustrates a low-balling technique.
Read more about low-balling technique
<em>brainly.com/question/14565653</em>
#SPJ12
Answer: B- the change in total utility from consuming one more unit of a good
Explanation: Marginal utility is the change in utility that arises from consuming one more unit of a good or service.
Utility is the total satisfaction that occurs from consuming a commodity or service.
Average utility is total utility divided by the number of goods consumed.
Answer:
The correct option is a.
Explanation:
In the question, it is given that there are two firms namely U and L who has same same amounts of assets, investor supplied material, and Return on investor capital.
The Firm U is unleveraged which has 100% equity
whereas, Firm L is leveraged firm which has 50% debt and 50% equity
As we have to compare these two firms based on return on equity.
So, based on ROE, Firm U has 100% equity so it have more equity
And, the Firm L have 50% equity which means the firm has low equity as 50% contribution is gone to the debt.
The rest information which is given in the question is irrelevant. So, it is ignored.
Thus, the Firm L has a lower ROE than Firm U
Hence, the correct option is a.
Answer:
the pre tax cost of debt is 3.98%
Explanation:
The computation of the pre tax cost of debt is shown below;
Pre tax cost of debt is
= (Annual interest + (par value - market price) ÷ (number of years) ÷ (par value + market price) ÷ 2
= (0.05) + ($1,000 - $1,140) ÷ (20) ÷ ($1,000 + $1,140) ÷ 2
= 3.98%
Hence, the pre tax cost of debt is 3.98%
We simply applied the above formula so that the correct value could come
And, the same is to be considered