Given the situation described above, Alma will be able to cast <u>50 votes</u>.
This is because common stock gives voting rights to shareholders. And given that Alma has 50 shares of common stocks. Therefore, he would be able to cast 50 votes.
On the other hand, preferred stocks give no voting rights to shareholders.
However, preferred shareholders have preference over a company's revenue or earnings, which implies that they are paid dividends before common shareholders.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "50 votes."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/3518273
Answer:
present value = $7296.14
Explanation:
given data
future value = $34,000
time t = 20 year
rate r = 8% = 0.08
solution
we apply here future value formula for get present value that is
future value = present value × 
.....................1
put her value and we get
$34,000 = present value × 
present value = 
present value = 
present value = $7296.14
Answer:
- <u><em>D. It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
Explanation:
Of course, ethics mandates that the target of science and <em>new technology </em>should always pursue the good for humans; nevertheless, since time immemorial man has developed technology to make war. Thus, definetely, the first statement <em>"A It always does good for human"</em> is false.
Some other negative effects of <em>new technology</em>, like cars and nuclear power, have been harmful to the environment, but you cannot tell that this has always been so. Technology has also been developed to help the environment. For instance, panels to use solar energy do not harm the environment and seek to reduce fuel burning to help the environment. Thus, option <em>B, "It always ends up doing harm to the environment"</em> is false too.
Some of the damage that new technology can produce are not predicted both because the technology is new and because it may be used with different goals to those it was developed. This explains why option <em>C, It has many bad effects</em>, is false, and option <em>D, "It has both good and bad effects, but we can't always predict what those are", </em>is true.
Answer:
they provide incentives for firms to develop technologies that are less polluting.
Explanation:
Pollution can be defined as the physical degradation or contamination of the environment through an emission of harmful, poisonous and toxic chemical substances.
Offset trading refers to a type of trading system that is typically designed for the realization of more efficient pollution control.
This ultimately implies that, it can be described as a program that allows new firms to pay existing firms to reduce their emissions below a standard.
Free market in tradable pollution permits simply means giving manufacturing companies and individuals the legal right to pollution of the environment. For example, XYZ company is purchasing the permit of 500 units of carbon dioxide (CO2) pollution annually, this simply means it is permitted to pollute the environment by 500 units of CO2 annually.
Additionally, a free market in tradable pollution permits has some sort of benefits as companies can resell their unused permits or devise a cheaper means of reducing pollution. It also compensate companies that significantly reduces its pollution of the environment.
Hence, an advantage of tradable emissions permits is that they provide incentives for firms to develop technologies that are less polluting because it would reduce the amount they would have to pay for pollution.
