B, the fourteenth amendment. I hope that answered your question!
Answer:
Explanation:
Specify the key requirements for police officers in determining the lawfulness of the use of force in making an arrest and what is meant by "reasonableness
Answer:
i’m white and i agree with you, there is no reason for people to be treated differently because of race
Explanation:
Answer:
Making Right and Left Turns. Right Turn: As you prepare to turn, reduce speed and stay as far to the right as possible. Begin the turn in the lane nearest to the right-hand curb and end the turn in the lane nearest the right-hand curb.
Explanation:
<em>I </em><em>cant </em><em>tell </em><em>if </em><em>this </em><em>is </em><em>about </em><em>driving </em><em>or </em><em>sumn</em><em> </em><em>so </em><em>Im </em><em>sorry </em><em>if </em><em>its </em><em>wrong--</em>
The SCOTUS did not rule that T.L.O’s 4th amendment (searches and seizures) rights had been violated. They ruled that the school administrations search of the bag was reasonable under the circumstances (i.e T.L.O. Being a minor and on school property, meaning that while at school, administration is responsible for the well-being and safety of all students, thus allowing them to search T.L.O’s bag for marijuana). A good way to think of it is that while you’re at school, the administration acts as your parents. Your parents don’t need a warrant to search through your room and neither does the administration if you are on school property. The 4th amendment applies to this case because it protects against unlawful searches and seizures (i.e. searches and seizures that are without a warrant). The constitutional question was whether or not T.L.O. Could be charged with a crime/punished or not because the school administration did not have a warrant. However, because the school administration was acting as a loco parentis (latin term for “in place of the parent”) they did not need a warrant to search her bag. Hope this helped!
