Answer:
D
Explanation:
goverments did more and stuff
He Battle of Camden<span> in </span>South Carolina<span> was a lopsided victory for the </span>British<span> during the ... his </span>men<span>, Continental General Horatio </span>Gates<span> chose to engage </span>British<span> General ... The illness depleted the Patriot advantage in </span>troop<span> numbers, and the </span>British<span> ... With the </span>encounter<span> resulting in nearly 2,000 Patriots killed or taken prisoner .</span>
The best use of the excerpt in question by historians would be to understand <u>A. The</u><u> political debates</u><u> over </u><u>economic development. </u>
The excerpt focuses on Henry Clay and his argument for the Tariff of 1833 which would replace the Tariff of 1832 which had been controversial because:
- It essentially forced Southern States to buy goods at a higher rate from Northern manufacturers
- It led to Britain buying less goods from the South
The excerpt therefore showed how politicians debated over economic subjects such as tariffs and protectionism.
We can therefore conclude that historians could use it to better understand the political nature of debates over economic development at the time.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/5248524. </em>
Because his effort to drive out the Native Americans from US territories would be 'ethnic cleansing.' <span />
