Answer:
A.admissible as habit evidence
Explanation:
A passenger of Dan sustained injuries and filed a lawsuit against him. The passenger( plaintiff) presented someone to testify about how Dan has a bad reputation for reckless driving in the community.
This testimony by White would most likely be admissible in the court of law because Dan already has a bad reputation of the action he’s been charged with in his community.This makes it admissible as habit evidence.
<u>Answer:
</u>
'An air puff in the eye elicits an eye blink' is the statement that illustrates a US-UR pair.
Option: (B)
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- When an event generates an unconditioned stimulus, it is often followed by an unconditioned response spontaneously.
- This kind of stimulus is usually unavoidable and makes the subject vulnerable to respond in a specific manner that is expected for the type of stimulus received.
- The correlation between US and UR is characterized by the input-output link that is apparent in any given event.
The right lane.
:) Hope this helps!!
A) alaska :) i hope i helped
