Answer:
Please check the explanation.
Explanation:
The US education department mentioned that in 1900 there were only 10% of students enrolled in the schools, however by the end of 1992, the percentage increased by 85% and it became 95%. In 1930 1 million students were enrolled in university. And by 2012, it became 21.6 million. The teachers began to follow a new type of teaching, and the academics began to follow a special method for communique, education as well as for helping the students understand the concepts.
Though, after the 1980s the personal computer came into being in schools and colleges. Since then numerous versions of PC have originated in the marketplace as well as mobiles tracked by Smartphones, and now nearly 100% of people in the US have smartphones. Virtual reality, augmented reality, AI, Machine learning. etc. has cemented the way for the virtual classrooms. Also, each subject is now up with fruits and not just-food. The consequence is such a delightful setup of the Virtual schoolrooms in the entire US, and all over the ecosphere. The projectors, VR devices, AI applications for education, online classroom facility, Electronic version of chalkboards, and in fact everything is no sophisticated, and it is making not only teaching easy but learning as well. And the result is, students are ending up with better results, and teachers seem to be happier and more relaxed. And that is making school management satisfied as well.
The notation would be O (n-1) because there would be no need to compare with the first bit however this notation is most commonly noted as O (n) but the first is also technically correct
A sixteen bit microprocessor chip used in early IBM PCs. The Intel 8088 was a version with an eight-bit externaldata bus.
The Intel 8086 was based on the design of the Intel 8080 <span>and </span>Intel 8085 (it was source compatible with the 8080)with a similar register set, but was expanded to 16 bits. The Bus Interface Unit fed the instruction stream to theExecution Unit through a 6 byte prefetch queue, so fetch and execution were concurrent - a primitive form ofpipelining (8086 instructions varied from 1 to 4 bytes).
It featured four 16-bit general registers, which could also be accessed as eight 8-bit registers, and four 16-bit indexregisters (including the stack pointer). The data registers were often used implicitly by instructions, complicatingregister allocation for temporary values. It featured 64K 8-bit I/O (or 32K 16 bit) ports and fixed vectored interrupts.There were also four segment registers that could be set from index registers.
The segment registers allowed the CPU to access 1 meg of memory in an odd way. Rather than just supplyingmissing bytes, as most segmented processors, the 8086 actually shifted the segment registers left 4 bits and addedit to the address. As a result, segments overlapped, and it was possible to have two pointers with the same valuepoint to two different memory locations, or two pointers with different values pointing to the same location. Mostpeople consider this a brain damaged design.
Although this was largely acceptable for assembly language, where control of the segments was complete (it couldeven be useful then), in higher level languages it caused constant confusion (e.g. near/far pointers). Even worse, thismade expanding the address space to more than 1 meg difficult. A later version, the Intel 80386, expanded thedesign to 32 bits, and "fixed" the segmentation, but required extra modes (suppressing the new features) forcompatibility, and retains the awkward architecture. In fact, with the right assembler, code written for the 8008 canstill be run on the most <span>recent </span>Intel 486.
The Intel 80386 added new op codes in a kludgy fashion similar to the Zilog Z80 and Zilog Z280. The Intel 486added full pipelines, and clock doubling (like <span>the </span>Zilog Z280).
So why did IBM chose the 8086 series when most of the alternatives were so much better? Apparently IBM's own engineers wanted to use the Motorola 68000, and it was used later in the forgotten IBM Instruments 9000 Laboratory Computer, but IBM already had rights to manufacture the 8086, in exchange for giving Intel the rights to its bubble memory<span> designs.</span> Apparently IBM was using 8086s in the IBM Displaywriter word processor.
Other factors were the 8-bit Intel 8088 version, which could use existing Intel 8085-type components, and allowed the computer to be based on a modified 8085 design. 68000 components were not widely available, though it could useMotorola 6800 components to an <span>extent.
</span>
Hope this helps
