Answer:
The slope is -5/2 :)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
∫tan(x)dx∫cot(x)dx∫sec(x)dx∫csc(x)dx====−ln∣∣cos(x)∣∣+C=ln∣∣sec(x)∣∣+Cln∣∣sin(x)∣∣+C=−ln∣∣csc(x)∣∣+Cln∣∣sec(x)+tan(x)∣∣+C−ln∣∣csc(x)+cot(x)∣∣+C
Answer:
c)The proof writer mentally assumed the conclusion. He wrote "suppose n is an arbitrary integer", but was really thinking "suppose n is an arbitrary integer, and suppose that for this n, there exists an integer k that satisfies n < k < n+2." Under those assumptions, it follows indeed that k must be n + 1, which justifies the word "therefore": but of course assuming the conclusion destroyed the validity of the proof.
Step-by-step explanation:
when we claim something as a hypothesis we can only conclude with therefore at the end of the proof. so assuming the conclusion nulify the proof from the beginning
Answer:
We can't set up a proportion to solve for x in a percent equation. For example, 34/100=5/x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<h2>f(-7) = -6</h2>
Step-by-step explanation:
Put x = -7 to f(x) = 2x + 8:
f(-7) = 2(-7) + 8 = -14 + 8 = -6
