A salamander relies on hydrogen bonding to stick to various surfaces. therefore, a salamander would have the greatest difficulty clinging to a <u>surface of hydrocarbons</u><u>.</u>
<h3>What is a
hydrogen bonding?</h3>
It refers to the interaction involving a hydrogen atom located between a pair of other atoms having a high affinity for electrons, such bond are weaker than an ionic bond or covalent bond but stronger than van der Waals forces.
They can exist between atoms in different molecules or in parts of the same molecule. One atom of the pair such as a fluorine, nitrogen or oxygen atom, is covalently bonded to a hydrogen atom whose electrons it shares unequally.
Read more about hydrogen bonding
brainly.com/question/12798212
#SPJ1
Answer:
Walking to the convenience
store to buy a snack.
False, while the supply of major film stars is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for the average doctor or nurse is quite large globally. By stating that the marginal benefit of services provided by doctors and nurses is considerably lower than the marginal benefit of services provided by major film stars, the diamond-water paradox is illustrated. This suggests that while there is a greater demand than there is for major film stars, there is a greater supply of doctors and nurses.
The marginal utility that major movie stars provide to moviegoers is greater than the marginal utility that patients receive from doctors and nurses. This is due to the fact that people who use the services of well-known actors and actresses are more willing to pay for them than people who use the services of physicians and nurses. Though a person's health is more important to their quality of life than movies, consumers value movies more for their utility than their health, especially once they have achieved a basic level of sound health. This actually explains the "diamond water paradox," in which consumers are willing to pay more for valuable diamonds than they are for the water that sustains life. In plain English, people are more willing to value the satisfaction they get from watching one more movie than they are from receiving more medical attention. That implies that people only give basic healthcare needs a thought.
Note that the full question is:
Movie stars such as Salma Hayek, Samuel L. Jackson, Dwayne Johnson, and Jennifer Lawrence are paid millions of dollars per movie, which can take as much as 6 months of full-time work for an actor. By contrast, doctors and nurses earn considerably less over the same time period. Why might this be? While the supply of (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for (the average doctor or nurse OR movies featuring these film stars) is quite large globally. By contrast, the marginal benefit of the services provided by (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is relatively low, although the total benefit is quite high. This illustrates the diamond-water paradox. True or False
Learn more about marginal utility brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ4
Answer:
Firms may have to bid up stock price to complete repurchase, thus paying too much for its own stock.
Explanation:
Generally, the price of stocks are not fixed, so it might take a long time for a stock repurchase or buyback to be completed. Investors like buybacks since they tend to increase the price of stocks, but it makes them more expensive for the corporation to repurchase them.
Buybacks are seen positive by investors because they will eventually increase the earnings per share (by decreasing the number of shares outstanding) and they are also taxed in a lower rate than normal income. Management will tend to start buybacks when they believe the stock price is undervalued and they have excess cash. This way they will achieve achieve two objectives with one action:
- lower equity costs
- increase stock price
