Compare and contrast the goals and methods of cavour in italy and bismarck in germany

History

1 answer:

Mazyrski [523]3 years ago

6 0

Both Cavour and Bismarck used methods that we call <em>Realipolitik </em>(or "realistic politics").

Count Camillo di Cavour was prime minister of the Kingdom of Sardinia, serving under King Victor Emmanuel II. Cavour was a political realist who chose paths of action that would benefit his overall aims, whether or not they fit some specific ideology or master plan. Cavour and Victor Emmanuel II increased the influence of Piedmont-Sardinia, and took control of other Italian territories, working from north to south. Giuseppe Garibaldi conquered territories working from south to north, and then handed over what he had gained to the leadership of Victor Emmanuel II and Cavour for a united Italy.

Otto von Bismarck was Minster President and Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Kingdom of Prussia. In his leadership of Prussia, Bismarck helped create wars with neighboring countries to increase national pride among the German people. The main wars that Bismarck provoked in increasing national pride and unity among the German people were the Austro-Prussian War (1866) and the Franco-Prussian War (1870-71). Following the Franco-Prussian War, the German Empire was established, and Wilhelm I appointed Bismarck to the position of Chancellor.

You might be interested in

Mercantilism is ________________________________

Nezavi [6.7K]

A system in which countries kept their sole right to trade with their colonies

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

PLEASE HELP ASAP 50 POINTS

Delvig [45]

Answer:

B: It was slow and expensive to ship goods over land.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

In the mid-1800s, Democrats believed that a policy of Manifest Destiny would

prisoha [69]

In the mid-1800s, Democrats believed that a policy of Manifest Destiny would boost the American economy and open up economic opportunities.

<h3>What was the Manifest Destiny?</h3>

It meant the the idea that the United States is destined by God and its advocates to to expand its dominion and spread democracy and capitalism across the entire North American continent.

However, the Democrats believed that a policy of Manifest Destiny would boost the American economy and open up economic opportunities.

Therefore, the Option C is correct.