Answer:
During the Dust Bowl years, the weather destroyed nearly all the crops farmers tried to grow on the Great Plains. ... Farmers who rented the land and farmhouse couldn't pay rent, and farmers who owned their land couldn't make payments. Parents packed up their children and belongings and moved West.
Explanation:
g o o g l e
have a nice day.
Many former slaves still were unedumercated and needed to find jobs this lead to a legal form of work known as share cropping (tending to crops for a portion of the crop or a low wage pay)
Well it depends on the question they did many things they started to own land and vote and also become more independent but I would need to see the question to answer accurately
Answer:
She should be prosecuted
Explanation:
In order to convict a defendant of malicious destruction of property, the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:
The defendant destroyed or damaged the personal property, building, or dwelling house of another person;
The defendant did so willfully; and.
The defendant acted with malice.
I copied this online, so don't copy, but this shows why you could convict Tracy of the crime. She destroyed people's personal property, their phones, which she did willfully. This goes to show why she should be prosecuted and charged. Thanks, and I hope this helps! BRAINLIEST PLEASE!
Answer:
Explanation:
I don't see how this is possible, but the answer seems to be A which is the only answer that makes sense.
Large tax cuts don't have anything to do with supply of goods. It does help consumption but that is not the same thing as supply side economics.
C is much truer for the aftermath of WWI than a general statement about Supply. I don't think it is the right answer.
It didn't call for increased government spending unless the government wanted the goods being produced.
I think I'd go with A. It is the most straight forward.
