Answer:
5576
Step-by-step explanation:
Since
, we can rewrite the integral as

Now there is no ambiguity about the definition of f(t), because in each integral we are integrating a single part of its piecewise definition:

Both integrals are quite immediate: you only need to use the power rule

to get
![\displaystyle \int_0^11-3t^2\;dt = \left[t-t^3\right]_0^1,\quad \int_1^4 2t\; dt = \left[t^2\right]_1^4](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cdisplaystyle%20%5Cint_0%5E11-3t%5E2%5C%3Bdt%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5Bt-t%5E3%5Cright%5D_0%5E1%2C%5Cquad%20%5Cint_1%5E4%202t%5C%3B%20dt%20%3D%20%5Cleft%5Bt%5E2%5Cright%5D_1%5E4)
Now we only need to evaluate the antiderivatives:
![\left[t-t^3\right]_0^1 = 1-1^3=0,\quad \left[t^2\right]_1^4 = 4^2-1^2=15](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5Bt-t%5E3%5Cright%5D_0%5E1%20%3D%201-1%5E3%3D0%2C%5Cquad%20%5Cleft%5Bt%5E2%5Cright%5D_1%5E4%20%3D%204%5E2-1%5E2%3D15)
So, the final answer is 15.
Option A: The sum for the infinite geometric series does not exist
Explanation:
The given series is 
We need to determine the sum for the infinite geometric series.
<u>Common ratio:</u>
The common difference for the given infinite series is given by

Thus, the common difference is 
<u>Sum of the infinite series:</u>
The sum of the infinite series can be determined using the formula,
where 
Since, the value of r is 3 and the value of r does not lie in the limit 
Hence, the sum for the given infinite geometric series does not exist.
Therefore, Option A is the correct answer.
Answer:
12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5
Step-by-step explanation: