Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
If you run: print("StatsCourse") in R, R will display: "StatsCourse", Option B.
Explanation:
R is a language,mostly written in C and environment for statistical computing and graphics.
Out of the given options, R will display StatsCourse, If we run print("StatsCourse"). It is a command to display what is given in the brackets and the command will be followed.
It will not send "StatsCourse" to local printer, as per Option A. Thew command for printing is different. It will not show full data in the file named "StatsCourse", as there is no such file, as per Option C. Option D is also incorrect as no error message will be returned.
true.
then it angered the colonists & led to the Boston tea party
<span />
Answer:
A study of the genetic links between DNA samples found at a prehistoric central Asian archeological site and west coast Native American tribes.
Explanation:
The results from research have been known to produce harms to members of the sampled population who do not actually participate in the research study. An example of the type of research that could result in group harms by stigmatizing members of the group (even for individuals who do not participate in the research) is a study of the genetic links between DNA samples found at a prehistoric central Asian archeological site and west coast Native American tribes.
Answer:
no he shouldn't have to take the blame
Explanation:
