Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Answer:
D. Political parties
Explanation:
Washington was notorious for his view against political parties.
Washington wanted the people in government to unify under a single cause :To improve the general well being of all citizens.
He believed that political parties generally only work for the interest of their supporter base rather than for the benefit of the people as a whole. He believed, this is dangerous for the unity of the nations.
Answer:
Political cartoons can be very funny, especially if you understand the issue that they're commenting on. Their main purpose, though, is not to amuse you but to persuade you. A good political cartoon makes you think about current events, but it also tries to sway your opinion toward the cartoonist's point of view.
Explanation:
