Answer:
(1, 2)
Step-by-step explanation:
Remember that the final shape and position of a figure after a transformation is called the image, and the original shape and position of the figure is the pre-image.
In our case, our figure is just a point. We know that after the transformation T : (x, y) → (x + 3, y + 1), our image has coordinates (4, 3).
The transformation rule T : (x, y) → (x + 3, y + 1) means that we add 3 to the x-coordinate and add 1 to the y-coordinate of our pre-image. Now to find the pre-image of our point, we just need to reverse those operations; in other words, we will subtract 3 from the x-coordinate and subtract 1 from the y-coordinate.
So, our rule to find the pre-image of the point (4, 3) is:
T : (x, y) → (x - 3, y - 1)
We know that the x-coordinate of our image is 4 and its y-coordinate is 3.
Replacing values:
(4 - 3, 3 - 1)
(1, 2)
We can conclude that our pre-image is the point (1, 2).
Answer:
The area of the shaded portion of the figure is
Step-by-step explanation:
see the attached figure to better understand the problem
we know that
The shaded area is equal to the area of the square less the area not shaded.
There are 4 "not shaded" regions.
step 1
Find the area of square ABCD
The area of square is equal to

where
b is the length side of the square
we have

substitute

step 2
We can find the area of 2 "not shaded" regions by calculating the area of the square less two semi-circles (one circle):
The area of circle is equal to

The diameter of the circle is equal to the length side of the square
so
---> radius is half the diameter
substitute


Therefore, the area of 2 "not-shaded" regions is:

and the area of 4 "not-shaded" regions is:

step 3
Find the area of the shaded region
Remember that the area of the shaded region is the area of the square less 4 "not shaded" regions:
so
---> exact value
assume

substitute
Answer:
I<em>t D</em>e<em>p</em>en<em>d</em>s
Step-by-step explanation:
Won: 4/7 x 35 = 20
lost: 3/7 x 35 = 15
Answer:
Both are irrational
Step-by-step explanation:
is a trick as it does simplify to
, but that is irrational