The government assume a contractionary fiscal policy when the economy is strong. When the economy is strong, prices increases as a result of fierce competition for resources. In this situation, the government will assume a contractionary fiscal policy by reducing its spending and by increasing tax. This position will normally create a surplus for the government: a surplus is the amount of taxes left over after government spending.
Explanation:
The disadvantages of home work can directly impact the employer, the employee and society by reducing the interaction of workers in the organizational environment.
Social interaction at work is an advantageous factor for the conception of new ideas, innovation, problem solving, and relationships that can encourage and motivate the performance of work.
For the worker, it can directly impact their motivation for work, which can generate stressful situations due to the lack of interaction with other co-workers. For the employer it can mean difficulties in coordinating and monitoring work, ineffective communication, etc.
For society, on the other hand, it can constitute significant changes in work, which can cause difficulties in interpersonal relationships, and difficulty for group living.
Answer:
Option D is correct option.
<u>Short call and long put</u>
Explanation:
Short call and long put = - max (S - K, 0) + max (K - S, 0);
As S declines, the payoff from long put position improves. As S increases, payoff from short call position loses money. This option satisfies the condition put in the question.
Answer:
31
Explanation:
The calculation of indifferent between your current mode of operation and the new option is shown below:-
Current Operation
Contribution Margin = Monthly Fees - Variable Cost
= $734.00 - $91.00
= $643.00
Total Fixed Cost = Rent and Utilities + Salaries + Insurance
= $5,435.00 + $6,171.00 + $1,545.00
= $13,151.00
New Operation
Contribution Margin = Monthly Fees - Variable Cost
= $1,054.00 - $158.00
= $896.00
Total Fixed Cost = Rent and Utilities + Salaries + Insurance
= $11,679.00 + $6,974.00 + $2,408.00
= $21,061.00
Here we will assume the indifferent number of students will be X
So,
Income under current option = Income under new option
$643.00 × X - $13,151.00 = $896.00 × X - $21,061.00
$253X = $7,910
X = $7,910 ÷ $253
= 31.26
or
= 31
Answer:
The benefits of a High Speed Rail in California:
- It becomes a feasible alternative to air travel, because it can be either cheaper, or even faster, since passengers do not have to spend as much time on a train station as they do on an airport.
- If demand is high enough, state highways can become less congested, because many people who would otherwise travel by car, would take a high speed train instead.
- Because the trains are electric, they are likely to help reduce pollution.
The cons would be:
- We cannot know for sure how many people would take the high speed trains. Demand could not be high enough to justify the cost.
- The line would be very costly.
- It could end up benefit only a small section of the population who would take the trains, or who travel often.
I believe that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks, as can be seen in most countries where high speed lines have been made between large cities. For example, in Spain, the line between Madrid and Barcelona is profitable. The same would likely happen for a line between Los Angeles and San Francisco.
What are the implications of starting a project based on tenuous projections that may or may not come true 10 years from now?
If demand projections are tenous, there is always the possiblity that the high speed line could not be profitable. However, this risk can be lowered if the line is made between highly populated cities.
Could you justify the California high-speed rail project from the perspective of a massive public works initiative?
Yes, a high speed rail would be a project that could massively impact California. The benefits of its operation could outweight the cost.
In other words, what other factors enter into the decision of whether to pursue a high-speed rail project?
As I said before, the most important factor is to construct line between highly populated cities in order to reduce the risk of not having enough demand. It has been demonstrated around the world, in Spain, in Italy, in Japan, in China, that high speed lines that connect very populated regions, can be profitable.
