<u>Matching each words to their description </u>
- Depression -----> a low place
- Steppe -------> a vast, treeless plain
- Equator ------> imaginary line running around the center of the earth
- Plateau -------> a large, high plain
- Isthmus -----> a narrow strip of land connecting other lands
- Longitude ------> measurement of distance in degrees east or west of the prime meridian
- Geography ------> the study of the earth
- Latitude -------> measurement of distance in degrees north or south of the equator
<h3>Defining some terminologies </h3>
The equator is an imaginary line running through the middle of the earth dividing the earth into north and south poles. while latitude is the measurement of the distance between the north and south poles measured in degrees.
The study of the earth composition such as rocks, soil and weather/climatic conditions can be categorized into geography.
Hence we can conclude that answers to your question are as listed above.
Learn more about climatic terminologies : brainly.com/question/24793273
#SPJ1
Answer:
No, I don’t think the Brown court would have said that people could be separated by race on a train. Brown fought against segregation in schools because it was unconstitutional and violated the 14th Amendment. I can’t see why they would agree with segregation in other institutions.
The Plessy case, which occurred quite a bit earlier than the Brown case, ruled that segregation was okay as long as it was “separate but equal.” If it was Plessy v. Brown, Brown could have made the argument that “If it has to be separate, it’s not truly equal.” There’s no reason to divide the people unless there’s unfair treatment involved.
Positive:
The founding of North America
Acquiring of wealth and natural resources
Negative:
The colonialism of Spain and Britain (From native's pov)
Slavery of natives
Led to the Atlantic Slave Trade
Arguably led to the Scramble for Africa
Napoleon Bonaparte had a contradictory character. He had an unusual personality. The writer Germaine de Staël described him as being ‘neither good nor violent, neither gentle nor cruel’, which denotes that he was <em>neutral</em>, a<em> calm </em>and <em>calculated/prudent </em>person. he was considered<em> unique </em>and <em>very special </em>for the actions he took and the thinking he put into taking decisions. By the French writer Stendhal, he was seen as <em>very </em><span><em>ambitious</em> (''endowed with amazing abilities and a dangerous ambition’'). He was very <em>firm</em> when it was about facing his <span>opponents. Even more, he could get even mad when his passions had to face disputes. He was a very difficult person, but that made him more <em>powerful </em>than the others. Also, it is said that ''his diversity (<em>diverse</em>) made him <em>fascinating''</em>. He was hostile to his older brother. He had a military, legislative and <span>diplomatic talent. |He was<em> popular</em>, but his more of defects were: picky (<span>squeamish), selfish, egocentric.</span></span></span></span>
