Answer:
Income +/- inventory adjustment
2015: 138,000 - 23,000 = 115,000
2016: 254,000 + 61,000 = 315,000
2017: 168,000 + 17,000 = 185,000
Explanation:
<u>Inventory Identity:</u>
Beginning + Purchases = Ending + COGS
As the mistake is on the right side it compensates by the other component which is COGS
<u><em>When the inventory is overstated</em></u> this means COGS is understated.
We didn't record the cost of good sold thefore our gross profit is higher making the net income higher.
<u><em>When the inventory is understated</em></u> this means COGS is overstated.
We record more cost of goods sold thefore our gross profit is lower making the net income fewer as well.
Answer:
Retained earnings-Closing = $19,900
Explanation:
Given that,
Revenues = $22,400
Operating Expenses = $15,000
Dividends = $4,500
Retained Earnings(opening) = $17,000
Net Income = Revenues - Operating expenses
= $ 22,400 - $15,000
= $7,400
Statement of Retained Earnings:
Retained earnings-Closing:
= Retained earnings -opening + Net Income - Dividends
= $17,000 + $7,400 - $4,500
= $19,900
Answer:
Efficient market school.
Explanation:
Efficient market school is the market school which argues that forward exchange rates do the best possible job for forecasting future spot exchange rates, so investing in exchange rate forecasting services would be a waste of time because it is impossible to have a consistent alpha generation on a risk adjusted excess returns basis as market prices are only affected by new informations.
The efficient market school also known as the efficient market hypothesis (EMH) is a hypothesis that states that asset (share) prices reflect all information and it is very much impossible to consistently beat the market.
Also, forward exchange rates are exchange rates controlling foreign exchange transactions at a specific future date or time.
<em>Hence, according to the efficient market school it would be a waste of time investing in exchange rate forecasting services because all the information about an asset or security is already factored into their prices and as a result of the randomness of the market. </em>
Answer:
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Explanation:
Is necessary to consider different amount of suppliers and evaluate the cost. We will choose the number of suppliers which offers a lower cost.
- EMV1 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk + cost of managing supplier = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05+16000 = 9600 + 24000 + 16000 = $ 49600
- EMV2 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of shutdown*unique event risk of each supplier*unique event risk of each supplier + cost of managing 2 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 1200 + 16000*2 = $ 42800
- EMV3 = cost of shutdown*super event risk + cost of managing 3 suppliers = 480000*.02 + 480000*0.05*.05+16000*2 = 9600 + 16000*3 = $ 57600
Based on the EMV value, the best choice is to use Two suppliers
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Inflation is a persistent rise in general price level
Rise in Inflation rate = 220 / 200 - 1 = 10%
Rise in tuition fees = 115 / 100 - 1 = 15%
From the calculations, the percentage change in tuition fees is higher than the percentage change in inflation rate
