1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gala2k [10]
3 years ago
7

In 322 BC, Chandragupta Maurya founded the Mauryan dynasty. The central government formed by Chandragupta Maurya provided a stab

le and unified nation. This political and military unity allowed all kinds of trade to expand and thrive. Internal trade also improved because of the single currency that Chandragupta established in India. Trade along the Silk Road grew because of the decreased number of bandits on the roads.
What can be best inferred from this passage?
A.
Mauryas wanted to form a good relationship with their neighbors.
B.
The expansion of trade brought about political unity in India.
C.
Chandragupta encouraged external trade to control the Silk Road.
D.
Internal and external trade developed productivity and economic activity in India
plato
History
1 answer:
irina1246 [14]3 years ago
7 0
Answer:
D. Internal and external trade developed productivity and economic activity in India
You might be interested in
Understanding the Case
S_A_V [24]

Answer:

Marbury: Was appointed as a federal judge - Supported the Judiciary Act of 1789 - Argued for original jurisdiction.

-Madison: Refused to honor an appointment.Explanation:

Marbury v. Madison was a judicial case resolved by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. It arose as a result of a political dispute following the presidential elections of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson, who was a Democratic Republican, defeated then-President John Adams, who was a federalist. In the last days of the outgoing government of Adams, the Congress, dominated by the federalists, established a series of judicial positions, among them 42 justices the of peace for the District of Columbia. The Senate confirmed the appointments, the president signed them and the Secretary of State was in charge of sealing and delivering the appointment documents. In the last-minute hustle and bustle, the outgoing secretary of state did not deliver the minutes of appointment to four justices of the peace, including William Marbury.

The new secretary of state under President Jefferson, James Madison, refused to deliver the minutes of appointment as the new government was irritated by the maneuver of the federalists of trying to secure control of the judiciary with the appointment of members of their party just before ceasing in government. However, Marbury appealed to the Supreme Court to order Madison to deliver his record.

If the Court ruled in favor of Marbury, Madison could still refuse to deliver the record and the Supreme Court would have no way to enforce the order. If the Court ruled against Marbury, it risked submitting the judiciary to Jefferson's supporters by allowing them to deny Marbury the position he could legally claim. Chief Justice John Marshall resolved this dilemma by deciding that the Supreme Court was not empowered to settle this case. Marshall ruled that Section 13 of the Judiciary Act, which granted the Court these powers, was unconstitutional because it extended the original jurisdiction of the Court to the jurisdiction defined by the Constitution itself. Having decided not to intervene in this particular case, the Supreme Court secured its position as final arbiter of the law.

8 0
3 years ago
What are 5 areas that roman power extended to?
kolezko [41]
England, France (Gaul), Spain, Greece, and the Middle East
7 0
3 years ago
what methods did the Nazis use to separate Jewish people and other targeted groups from the rest of the population?
Nesterboy [21]

The Nazis separated Jewish people into small, condensed communities called <u>ghettos</u>. They also gave the Jewish populace <u>Yellow patches</u> (or badges), so, they would be able to identify the Jews from the rest of the population.

7 0
3 years ago
Which is a shared responsibility between state governments and federal government
vfiekz [6]

Answer:

Explanation: Federalism is a system which is based on democratic practices and traditions. Accordingly, in this system, the power to rule is distributed between national and state assembly. ... Making and enforcing laws is a shared duty between state governments in the federal government

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were the Jews and gypsies similar and how were they different?
Stella [2.4K]

Answer:

In addition to six million Jews, more than five million non-Jews were killed under the Nazi regime. Among them were Gypsies, Jehovah's Witnesses, homo, blacks, the physically and mentally disabled, political opponents of the Nazis, including Communists and Social Democrats, dissenting clergy, resistance fighters, prisoners of war, Slave people

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 7. What was De Witt Clinton's contribution to water travel?
    6·1 answer
  • Which countries remained under soviet control after ww2?
    6·1 answer
  • . A bicameral legislature features
    7·2 answers
  • What happened on New Year's eve in New York City
    14·1 answer
  • Equiano and wheatley had the same reaction to being brought as a slave true or flase
    14·1 answer
  • A "blitz" is different from a "blitzkrieg" because only a "blitz"
    7·1 answer
  • William shakespear popularity as a poet and a
    13·1 answer
  • Which group was set up in 1957 to investigate all claims of voter discrimination?
    10·1 answer
  • When did Harriet Tubman Die?
    6·1 answer
  • Why do historians believe Great Britain was the birthplace of the Industrial Revolution? Be Specific
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!