All categories

2 years ago

In which of the following cases is the Coase theorem most likely to solve the externality?

Business

1 answer:

inessss [21]2 years ago

4 0

Answer:

a. Ed is allergic to his roommate's cat.

Explanation:

In the case of coase theorem the economic conditions in which there is a conflict of proerty rights and the parties that are involved could bargain or negotiate the terms so this will correctly to be shown the complete cost also the values related to the property rights at issue that could result in the effecient outcome or result

So as per the given situation, the option a is correct

You might be interested in

Are you a people person? Do you like to join clubs, help others, give instructions, influence decisions, or plan social events?

Montano1993 [528]

Answer:

Yes I do.

Explanation:

1. Serve others.

2. Plan a community bazar to gain founds and donate them to local foundations with social objetives.

3. Organize a cinema at park festival for help vulnerable population to enjoy and recreate different activities that they normally don't have access to.

4. Go to a geriatric and plan some activities like chess contest, dance and teather to help them to feel distracted of the loneliness for a while at least one a week.

5. Go to visit to somebody and prepared some cookies, talk to that person, listen to and enjoy of a great chat.

6. Paste some motivational notes in random places. (subway, restaurants, public bathrooms).

8 0

3 years ago

List 4 stakeholders

Arada [10]

Answer:

Employees,Governments,Local communities,customer

4 0

2 years ago

The primary reason for the absence of much litigation under foreign competition law is:

Leona [35]

Answer:

III only.

Cultural attitudes toward antitrust law differ.

Explanation:

Competition law is an area of law that seeks to maintain a level playing field for all participants in an industry by protecting them against anti-competitive conduct by companies.

For example two major players in an industry may collaborate to raise price of goods.

However in foreign competition law we have to consider that cultural attitudes towards antitrust law differs. What is accepted in one country may not apply in another. So there is absence of litigation when considering competition in the foreign scene.

3 0

3 years ago

Kwik taxi service uses the units-of-activity method in computing depreciation on its taxicabs. Each cab is expected to be driven

zimovet [89]

Answer:

Explanation:

Depreciation cost :

2016: expected useful life

Cost - salvage value X usage

= 140,000

24,300-700

=5.93*28,000 = $166,101.69

2017: expected useful life

Cost - salvage value X usage

= 140,000

24,300-700

=5.93*33,000 = $195,762.71

Depreciation Expense:

2016: (cost-salvage value)*actual activity performed

total estimated useful life

= (24,300-700)*28,000

140,000

=$4,720

2017: (cost-salvage value)*actual activity performed

total estimated useful life

= (24,300-700)*33,000

140,000

=$5,562.86

6 0

3 years ago

A monopoly firm can sell 150 units of output for $10 per unit. Alternatively, it can sell 151 units of output for $9.98 per unit

Sliva [168]

If A monopoly firm can sell 150 units of output for $10 per unit. The marginal revenue of the 151st unit of output is $6.98.

<h3>Marginal revenue</h3>

Using this formula

Marginal revenue=(Number of units×Price per units)-(Alternate Number of units×Price per units)

Let plug in the formula

Marginal revenue=(151 units×$9.98 per units)-(150 units×$10 per units)

Marginal revenue=$1,506.98-$1,500

Marginal revenue=$6.98

Therefore the marginal revenue of the 151st unit of output is $6.98.

Learn more about marginal revenue here:brainly.com/question/10822075

3 0

2 years ago