“Crime” is not a phenomenon that can be defined according to any objective set of criteria. Instead, what a particular state, legal regime, ruling class or collection of dominant social forces defines as “crime” in any specific society or historical period will reflect the political, economic and cultural interests of such forces. By extension, the interests of competing political, economic or cultural forces will be relegated to the status of “crime” and subject to repression,persecution and attempted subjugation. Those activities of an economic, cultural or martial nature that are categorized as “crime” by a particular system of power and subjugation will be those which advance the interests of the subjugated and undermine the interests of dominant forces. Conventional theories of criminology typically regard crime as the product of either “moral” failing on the part of persons labeled as “criminal,” genetic or biological predispositions towards criminality possessed by such persons, “social injustice” or“abuse” to which the criminal has previously been subjected, or some combination of these. (Agnew and Cullen, 2006) All of these theories for the most part regard the “criminal as deviant” perspective offered by established interests as inherently legitimate, though they may differ in their assessments concerning the matter of how such “deviants” should be handled. The principal weakness of such theories is their failure to differentiate the problem of anti-social or predatory individual behavior<span> per se</span><span> from the matter of “crime” as a political, legal, economic and cultural construct. All human groups, from organized religions to outlaw motorcycle clubs, typically maintain norms that disallow random or unprovoked aggression by individuals against other individuals within the group, and a system of penalties for violating group norms. Even states that have practiced genocide or aggressive war have simultaneously maintained legal prohibitions against “common” crimes. Clearly, this discredits the common view of the state’s apparatus of repression and control (so-called “criminal justice systems”) as having the protection of the lives, safety and property of innocents as its primary purpose.</span>
Answer:
D. Discretionary income is the correct answer.
Explanation:
Discretionary income is the income left after making all the necessary payments such as rent, medicine, insurance, transportation and tax etc. While the sports entertainment industry doesn't depend on discretionary income, it generates significant revenue from corporate sponsorship, event marketing and sales of ancillary products(add on products that one can purchase in addition to the event tickets)
Answer:
Emotional consideration
Explanation:
There was emerging many of the emotions when you are through your treatment and these emotions are anxiety depression and frustration. There would be some communication gap or trouble arises between the people and relationship face trouble.
There are some way through that people overcome the obstacle:
- To communicate with your partner
- Managing family and friends
- To help you making decision
- The third-party collaboration
Answer:
Negative interactions have a greater impact on women because they place more importance on social relationships than men.
Explanation:
This is the explanation that is consistent with these findings. In this study, we see that women ages 51-64 are greatly affected in terms of health if they have to deal with negative social interactions. However, this is not the case with men. A theory that is consistent with these findings would have to present an argument that fits the results of the experiment. A possible explanation of this situation is that negative interactions have a greater impact on women because they place more importance on social relationships than men.
