Answer:
<em>The interest groups on the first Amendment allowed people to assemble together to speak their opinions and rights.</em>
<em>In 1971 the Federal Election Campaign Act was passed, setting limits on how people donate money in public disclosure of campaign.</em>
Explanation:
<em>People or individual would concur with me that interest groups under the Constitution have their right to encourage a particular point of view. What most people do not agree at some point, however, this is the level that some interest group influence activities preserved under the First constitution,
</em>
<em>
In addition to rights of free speech the First constitution allows people the right to come together. for example pluralists states that assembling in groups is normal and that people will tend to move toward others with same views</em>
<em>As of today, the debate about interest groups often circulates around whether the First Amendment shields the rights of groups and individuals to lend money, and if government can control the use of this money. </em>
<em>In 1971, the Federal Election Campaign Act was passed, setting limits on how much money presidential and vice-presidential candidates and their families could provide for their own campaigns.it also made unions and cooperation's to form PACs and expected public disclosure of campaign donations and their sources. </em>
<em>In 1 the year 1974, the act was modified in a way to control the amount of money used on congressional campaigns. </em>
It really depends on the time period, but if we're talking in general, China had Confucian views, while India had the caste system. Both were very patriarchal, but China's social system was more based on family values and India was more focused on jobs. China was way more strict ("women should stay in the house", foot binding, etc.) I hope this helps somewhat. :)
Harass people and eat their substance
Answer:
both determine the struture of a university
Explanation:
