1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
IRISSAK [1]
2 years ago
13

How many seconds are there in a day.1. 88,000 sec2. 86,400 sec 3. 88,999 sec​

History
1 answer:
SpyIntel [72]2 years ago
6 0
86,400 seconds in each day. There are 60 seconds in a minute, and 60 minutes in an hour. So you would take 60x60 to get 3600, that is for one hour. And since there are 24 hours in a day you would take 3600x24. The answer to that is 86,400z option 2 is correct
You might be interested in
What decision did the Supreme Court reach in Dred Scott v. Sandford?
loris [4]

Answer:

There have been many decisions in the history of the US Supreme Court that are hard to call democratic. In the British North American colonies, and then in the USA, the legal foundations of the institution of slavery were created. The English legal system ruled out slavery, but gradually in the local laws of the colonies, and later in the Constitution of the United States and in the case-law of the Supreme Court of the United States, the grounds were formulated on which slaves were considered not to be human subjects, but property. This practice has led to the fact that, shortly before the Civil War, a racist attitude was legalized not only towards slaves, but also to the entire black population of the United States, as is clearly seen in the case of Dread Scott v. Sandford.

Dread Scott was a slave whose owner John Emerson took him from Missouri, the state where slavery was allowed, to Illinois, where slavery was prohibited. A few years later, Scott returned to Missouri with Emerson. Scott believed that since he lived in a free state, he should no longer be considered a slave.

Emerson died in 1843, and three years later, Scott sued Emerson's widow, demanding his freedom. In 1850, he won the case in one of the Missouri courts, but in 1852, the state supreme court overturned the lower court. Meanwhile, Ms. Emerson remarried, and Scott became the legal property of her brother John Sanford. Scott sued Sanford to regain his freedom. The case was investigated in one of the federal courts, which in 1854 ruled against Sanford.

When this case was referred to the Supreme Court, its members decided that Scott did not become free by virtue of his living in a free state and that, being a black man, he is not a citizen and, therefore, has no right to file a lawsuit with a court in force according to the norms of general and statutory law. This decision was widely criticized and contributed to the election of Abraham Lincoln as president.

The judgment in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case was declared unconstitutional by the thirteenth constitutional amendment, which abolished slavery in 1865, and the fourteenth amendment, which granted citizenship to former slaves in 1868.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Give an example of a Scientific law you have
Reptile [31]

law of gravity. everything that goes up must come down because there is a force called gravity that is pushing down on every object on the earth. hope this helps bebe:)

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What kinds of discoveries prove that Great Zimbabwe was a kingdom built on trade?
olga2289 [7]

Answer:

By 1200 C.E., the city had grown strong, and was well known as an important religious and trading center. Some believe that religion triggered the city's rise to power, and that the tall tower was used for worship. The people of Great Zimbabwe most likely worshipped Mwari, the supreme god in the Shona religion.

Explanation:

With an economy based on cattle husbandry, crop cultivation, and the trade of gold on the coast of the Indian Ocean, Great Zimbabwe was the heart of a thriving trading empire from the 11th to the 15th centuries.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can you state 3 conclusions about Spanish exploration and settlement north of Mexico and the Spaniards interaction with Native A
Naddika [18.5K]

One conclusion would be that the main goal of the Spanish in almost all cases was to find and bring back gold, another would be that the natives were demolished, and another would be that steel was their most valuable weapon. 


Explanation:

Some Native Americans regenerate to Christianity however others did not.

Early Spanish explorers fail to search out a lot of gold north of United Mexican States, therefore, a settlement was restricted to far off missions and defensive outpost.

Spanish missionaries gave native Americans with smart materials, education, and protection however generally abused them.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
WILL MARK AS BRAINLIST
trasher [3.6K]

Answer:A. The right of all adult citizens to vote

Explanation: Suffrage is the right to vote.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!! :D ASAP
    12·1 answer
  • In 1898, which country captured and took control of the Spanish possessions of Guam and the Philippine Islands? A.China B.United
    15·2 answers
  • What role did experts such as business leaders, labor leaders, and university professors play in the Wisconsin Idea reforms
    10·2 answers
  • Which is another name for an orthadox view of a historical event or period?
    14·1 answer
  • Economic imperialism
    12·1 answer
  • Why is politics so important to the running of government
    14·1 answer
  • 5. Following the end of Reconstruction, African-American people living in the South became increasingly disillusioned as they fa
    7·1 answer
  • Which statement best completes the timeline?
    5·2 answers
  • The Himalayas is a mountain range in northern India.
    6·2 answers
  • When did WWII officially start
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!