True.
Many Latin Americans look for opportunities to leabe their countries or places of origin, Hoping to find a better place to stablish, with better job opportunities.
They escape from civil wars or worse socio-economics condition in a search of a better place to have a better future.
Answer:
i think its false. a conclusion is just a short summary that you use as an ending statement.
Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer: vertical merger
Explanation: A vertical merger involves similar businesses that are involved in particular specialized needs. For example, US steel produces steel which is used in making automobiles. General motors needs steel to produce automobiles. A merger between these two Companies is termed a vertical merger. Another example can be a grocery store that sells chicken eggs purchasing a poultry farm that rears chicken.
