Invading Cuba in 1898, the US did so to defend its interests and exact revenge on Cuba for the destruction of the USS Maine, which had blown up in Havana Harbor.
The fight for independence in Cuba was closely observed by the US. There were numerous American residents living in Cuba, and the United States had invested millions of dollars in businesses there. Likewise, the US and Cuba engaged in commerce. Long before 1898, the United States started to be interested in buying Cuba. After the Ten Years War, American sugar companies acquired substantial amounts of land in Cuba.
Learn more about Spanish-American War in 1898 here:
brainly.com/question/15214252
#SPJ4
<span>The overall system of taxation in the United States is progressive.</span>
Answer:
I believe it is to avoid military conflict, and still getting North Korea to change their Nuclear Weapon Policies and to stop North Korea from all spending on their military.
Explanation:
North Korea seemed to spend a lot of what they have on the Military. Foreigners to North Korea, that were for the most part, part of NATO wanted to help that happen without getting into some sort of nuclear conflict. They also wanted to change nuclear weapon policies, as the START treaty was in place between the US and Russia during Obama's first term of presidency I believe, and at the time leader, and current leader, Vladimir Putin has grown to like. So they wanted to talk to North Korea about it too.
Answer:
The best and most accurate answer between the choices would be the second one. As the Commerce and Slave Trade Compromise was reached, it stated that Congress cannot prevent slave trade, but could tax slaves that are imported. Hopefully the answer has come to your help.
Explanation:
Answer:
debunking
Explanation:
Debunking: In sociology, the term debunking was proposed by Peter Berger during 1963, and is referred to as the propensity of socio-logical consciousness.
Debunking represents the phenomenon that explains the sociological perspective in a way that it never takes a specific social world based on face value, in the absence of assuming the sociological perspective as it appears to be. Along with this, it offers judgment and nuances.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the process of debunking.