Answer:
f(x+1) = -3/4 × f(x)
Step-by-step explanation:
first of all, the sign of the numbers in the sequence is alternating. so, there must be a "-" involved.
that eliminates the first and third answer options.
and the absolute values of the numbers in the sequence are going down. |f(x+1)| < |f(x)|
that eliminates the fourth answer option, as this says that
|f(x)| < |f(x+1)|. and that is the opposite of how the actual sequence behaves.
Answer:I think thats a...
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Following are the solution to this question:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this set, the correlation coefficient is = -0.015.
It shows that financial variables have trust issues. Once a price rises, the other one is decreasing the value of -0,015 shows, that there are several fewer associations in the set of data among x and y and between y values. This interaction also can range between -1 to 1, to 0 being completely unrelated. But you'd never be sure, in this situation, 0.015 is very similar to 0.
It means that your prediction is nothing better than just a wild choice. Its odds of an estimated value being relatively close to the actual result are therefore much smaller as the points are it's hardly the best match.
3:6 3,6,9 6,12,18,24
9:24. ~~ ~~
Yes it is equivalent because if you divide 9:24 with 3 it will equal 3:6 and if you keep adding with 3:6 buy it's self it will eventually aqualung 9:24
The answer is I believe b=70
