Answer:
The Miller Test is the primary legal test for determining whether expression constitutes obscenity. It is named after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Miller v. California (1973). The Miller test faced its greatest challenge with online obscenity cases. In Ashcroft v. ACLU (2002), a case challenging the constitutionality of the Child Online Protection Act, several justices questioned the constitutionality of applying the local community standards of Miller to speech on the Internet. In this photo, Associate Legal Director of the ACLU Ann Beeson gestures during a news conference outside the Supreme Court on Tuesday, March 2, 2004 in Washington. The ACLU claimed COPA violated the First Amendment guarantee of free speech. They challenged the law on behalf of online bookstores, artists and others, including operators of Web sites that offer explicit how-to sex advice or health information. The Supreme Court agreed with the lower court’s ruling that COPA did not pass the strict scrutiny test used to judge obscenity cases. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci, used with permission from the Associated Press)
Explanation:
d
During civil lawsuit proceedings regarding alcohol service, courts will try to determine if the the intoxication of the guests was done forcefully or not, the policies followed and guests were not made to drink beyond the certain level.
<u>Explanation:</u>
During the time of civil lawsuit proceedings, there are certain things that the courts will try to determine which are related to the serving of the alcohol to the guests. The court will try to determine that there was proper following of the policies that the guests were protected from over drinking or drinking beyond a certain level.
The court will also determine that you caused or did not cause the guests to get intoxicated. Whether the guests were encouraged to be intoxicated or were not encouraged. These are the certain things that the court will determine during the time of civil lawsuit proceedings. But these are considered when there is service of alcohol being provided to the guests in the case.
Answer:
it may prejudice the potential jurors against the defendant
Answer:
take economics and government classes
Explanation:
I'm taking it right now and its pretty easy and you will have lots of fun learning about it
Answer:
The States Reorganisation Commission constituted by the Central Government of India on 22 December 1953 to recommend the reorganisation of state boundaries. In 1955, after nearly two years of study, the Commission recommended that India's state boundaries should be reorganised to form 14 states and 6 territories.
Explanation:
:)
