Answer:
False.
Explanation:
In fact research shows that 75% of false convictions are caused by a inaccurate eyewitness statement. This means up to 100 innocent people could be wrongfully convicted each year
Answer:
The court should stick to statutory language. These days common law is being turned into statutory law.
Explanation:
The U.S. legal system were set up based on the common law, which adhered to the precedents of earlier cases as sources of law. This principle is known as stare decisis. Under stare decisis, once a court has answered the question, the same question in other cases must draw out from the same court or lower court the same response in that jurisdiction.
Stare decisis is a doctrine which has always been a major part of the common law, court should follow precedents when they established clearly, expected under compelling reasons. The doctrine of stare decisis will remain valid even more common law is being turned into statutory law. After all, statutes have to be interpreted by the courts.
There is certainly less common law governing like environmental law than there was 100 years ago. The federal and state governments are increasingly regulating the aspects of commercial transaction between merchants and consumers, when disputes arise may be the courts should stick to statutory language.
My response towards the memo will be affirmative and I will try to solve the matter related to liquidity and ensure that the employees do not promote unionization.
<u>Explanation:</u>
As a human resource director, I am responsible for looking after and handling employees. HR director has to ensure that employees comply with all the rules and regulations.
Being a Human resource director I will have to comply with the directions given by Boss. So I will draft employment contract addendums for all the employees and will make sure that the employees follow the instructions.
Answer:
There are many answers so ima give one, We can listen and understand the candidates objective by looking at there past, Most would have done charity or giving to people in need. When they were younger they weren't as fortunate and lived like the majority before they became a candidate. This may show if they are trust worthy enough to represent the majority because they understand what its like for people in need.
Explanation:
