Answer:
It's 4.6 but rounded to 5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: -22/65
Step-by-step explanation: PLEASE GIVE BRAINLIEST IT HElPS ALOT
No. Mike wrote the ratio as the amount of change to the new amount. He should have used the ratio of the amount of change to the original amount, which is 55
55/275
, or 20%.
Answer: -1.5
Step-by-step explanation:
because the y-axis is the one that goes up and down and w is on -1.5 of it
