All categories

2 years ago

2/3w = 3/4 what’s the equation?

Mathematics

2 answers:

nexus9112 [7]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:

w=9/8

Hope I got it right

Alex Ar [27]2 years ago

3 0

Answer: w=9/8

Step-by-step explanation:

You might be interested in

Is this true? And also how does the equation from y-3=3(x-4) become a positive y+3=3x-12?

EastWind [94]

Step-by-step explanation:

the right equation is :

y-y1=m(x-x1)

y+3=3(x+4)

y+3= 3x+12

y=3x+12-3

y=3x+9

7 0

2 years ago

Assume the world catch of fish in 1950 was 12 million tons and in 1955 it was 96 million tons.

Rama09 [41]

The rate of change is 16.8 million tons per year

Solution:

Given that, the world catch of fish in 1950 was 12 million tons and in 1955 it was 96 million tons

The average rate of change is given by formula:

$\text{ Average rate of change } = \frac{\text{ change in value }}{\text{ number of years }}$

Value in 1950 = 12 million tons

Value in 1955 = 96 million tons

Change in value = value in 1955 - value in 1950

Change in value = 96 million - 12 million = 84 million tons

Number of years = 1950 to 1955 = 5 years

Substitute the given values in formula,

$\text{ Average rate of change } = \frac{84 \text{ million tons}}{5} = 16.8 \text{ million tons}$

Thus rate of change is 16.8 million tons per year

5 0

2 years ago

WHAT IS THE TOTAL CHANGE IN MEI'S CHECKING ACCOUNT IF SHE WRITES A $35 CHECK FOR SHOES, DEPOSITS $50, AND THEN WRITES A $55 CHEC

denpristay [2]

Answer:

-40

Step-by-step explanation:-35 + 50 -55 =-40

I think, may not be right

8 0

2 years ago

Of those women who are diagnosed to have early-stage breast cancer, one-third eventually die of the disease. Suppose a screening

Finger [1]

Answer:

A) Alternative hypothesis; Ha: p_o > ⅔

B) Null hypothesis;

H0: p_o = ⅔

C) There is sufficient evidence to support the claim that the community screening programme was effective

D) p-value = 0

Its less than the significance value and so we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the community screening programme was effective

Step-by-step explanation:

A) We are told that ⅓ of those diagnosed eventually die of the disease. Thus, ⅔ is the fraction that will survive the disease.

Thus, the null hypothesis is;

H0: p_o = ⅔

We are told that a screening programme was started to increase the survival rate. Thus,the alternative hypothesis is;

Ha: p_o > ⅔

B) null hypothesis is;

H0: p_o = ⅔

C) 164 out of the 200 women selected survived the disease.

Thus sample proportion is;

p^ = 164/200

p^ = 0.82

For the z-score value, we will use the formula;

z = (p^ - p_o)/√((p_o(1 - p_o)/n)

Now, p_o = ⅔ = 0.67

Thus;

z = (0.82 - 0.67)/√((0.67(1 - 0.67)/200)

z = 4.51

From online p-value from z-score calculator, we have p-value ≈ 0

This is less than the significant level of 0.05 and therefore we will reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the community screening program was effective.

D) p-value ≈ 0

Reject the null hypothesis

4 0

2 years ago

The graph shows the amount of money paid when purchasing bags of peanuts at the zoo:

I am Lyosha [343]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers