Answer: I would contend that the right answer is the C) whether or not student-athletes are students who participate in sports, or athletes who may also go to class.
Explanation: Just to elaborate a little on the answer, it can be added that Christopher Saffici and Robert Pellegrino wrote their article in 2012 with the title "Intercollegiate athletics vs. academics: the student-athlete or the athlete-student." Their main argument is that the students who are accepted in colleges due to their athletic skills often are not prepared to do well academically while meeting the expectations and demands as athletes, so, in turn, they are given preferential treatment in school, and they are overworked, becoming more athletes that go to college (without truly succeeding academically, as they are supposed to), that students who are also athletes.
In fact, they say that "It is not a question of whether or not the experience for a student-athlete is different from that of a traditional student. Instead, the issue at hand here is whether or not student-athletes are students that participate in extracurricular competitive sports, or have become athletes that also go to classes whenever their athletic schedules allow."
Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution is the amendment that covers the right for an accused person to prompt, public trial, to be informed of charges, and to have a lawyer. The Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution is actually a part of the Bill of Rights, that actually defines the rights that are directly related to criminal prosecution.The Supreme Court is the authority that applies the protections of the amendments to the states. As per this ammendment the accused has the right to have an impartial trial and the jury has to be impartial while taking a decision.
<u>Answer:</u>
<u>Answer:Although majority makes decision in democracy , the opinion of minority should not be neglected because of following reasons</u>:
- democracy is for all ,decision should be done without any discrimination .
- In democracy decision should need to make inclusively.
- minority have rights to say their feeling ,needs and conditions.
- As minority too are educated and rational.
- minority empowers communities and promotes the exercise of individual freedoms.
- Minority gives pressure to majority to make a good decision.
Answer:
An observational study of an association between two variables.
Explanation:
In the given scenario, it is an observational study of an association between two variables. The variables being :
- Explanatory variable (independant variable / predictor variable) may explain or influence changes in a response variable.
- Response variable (dependant variable) measures an outcome of a study.
Observational study observes individuals and records variables but doesn't attempt to influence the response (does not impose a treatment). It allows the researcher to directly observed the behavior of inteest rather than rely on the subject's self-descriptions (Survey) thus allowing the researcher to study the subject in its natural environment, thus removing the potentiallybased effect of the unnatural laboratory setting on the subject's performance.
