Explanation:Thomas Hobbes 'and John Locke's are famous political philosophers.There views regarding human nature similar at some places but at some other places they differ.
Similarities:
- Both the philosophers have given importance to human nature.
- Both the philosophers consider that there is need of government to exercise control over human beings.
- Both also refers to the risk that might arise when no governmental control is there.
- Both highlighted the point that there should be equality among humans,otherwise it might give rise to war like situations.
Differences:
Hobbes believed that human beings are not humble at all ,they are cruel by nature.As per him the fittest will survive so the need government to control them ,otherwise there will be war like situations.
Locke's believed that humans are social creatures ,they want to be the part of society.humans have good nature and they need government to maintain that nature.
I agree with Locke's point of view.His views are more positive as compared to Hobbes'
Here's a sentence: The United States has to care about national security but also keep it's treaty with other countries.
Answer:
The Renaissance was a fervent period of European cultural, artistic, political and economic “rebirth” following the Middle Age not sure if this helps but its what i could think of
Explanation:
Red Guards<span>, </span>Chinese (Pinyin) <span>Hongweibing </span>or (Wade-Giles romanization) Hung-wei-ping, in Chinese history, groups of militant university and high school students formed into paramilitary units as part of the Cultural Revolution (1966–76). These young people often wore green jackets similar to the uniforms of the Chinese army at the time, with red armbands attached to one of the sleeves. They were formed under the auspices of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in 1966 in order to help party chairman Mao Zedong combat “revisionist” authorities—i.e., those party leaders Mao considered as being insufficiently revolutionary. Mao was thus making a bid to regain control of the CCP from his colleagues, but the Red Guards who responded in August 1966 to his summons fancied themselves as new revolutionary rebels pledged to eliminating all remnants of the old culture in China, as well as purging all supposedly bourgeois elements within the government. Several million Red Guards journeyed to Beijing to meet with Mao in eight massive demonstrations late in 1966, and the total number of Red Guards throughout the country may have reached 11 million at some point.
While engaging in marches, meetings, and frenzied propagandizing, Red Guard units attacked and persecuted local party leaders as well as schoolteachers and school officials, other intellectuals, and persons of traditional views. Several hundred thousand people died in the course of these persecutions. By early 1967 Red Guard units were overthrowing existing party authorities in towns, cities, and entire provinces. These units soon began fighting among themselves, however, as various factions vied for power amidst each one’s claims that it was the true representative of Maoist thought. The Red Guards’ increasing factionalism and their total disruption of industrial production and of Chinese urban life caused the government in 1967–68 to urge the Red Guards to retire into the countryside. The Chinese military was called in to restore order throughout the country, and from this point the Red Guard movement gradually subsided.
<span>basically Jefferson was annoyed for the country patiently suffered these casually and that it is now time to expose these abuses to the nations of the world.</span>
