<span>Amazon creates many utilities for its customers, but perhaps the most valuable utility for consumers is place, the utility created by having the offerings available where consumers need it, on Amazon.com!
Amazon creates one central place for customers to find almost everything they could ever need or want. This keeps their customer base happy, committed and spending on Amazon.com daily. Why shop elsewhere when you can use Amazon.com as a 'one stop shop'? Amazon has built a very loyal customer base by providing options and great customer service. </span>
The syllogism used is conditional, that is, it occurs through deductive reasoning, because if the minor premise is true, the minor premise will also be true.
<h3 /><h3>What is Conditional syllogism?</h3>
It is a type of syllogism widely used in everyday life, but the conclusion is not always true, because despite having two true premises, the conclusion can be false, because the argumentation is not always valid, as it does not directly represent the premises.
Therefore, despite being syllogisms that follow the pattern of "If" and "then" to express a logic, the conclusion will not always be true, as this type of syllogism can also be hypothetical.
Find out more about syllogism here:
brainly.com/question/361872
The answer for your problem is a
Answer:
e). None of the above, because a perfect hedge does not exist
A perfect hedge is nearly impossible
Explanation:
A perfect hedge is a position undertaken by an investor that would eliminate the risk of an existing position, or a position that eliminates all market risk from a portfolio. In order to be a perfect hedge, a position would need to have a 100% inverse correlation to the initial position.
At the time of taking an opposite position in Derivatives Market, Perfect Hedge would mean covering the risk involved in the Cash Market Position completely, i.e. 100%. 2. Imperfect Hedge: When the position in the cash market is not completely hedged or not hedged to 100%, then such a hedge is called Imperfect Hedge.
Answer:
Individual rewards for contributions to the team
Explanation:
A team should share rewards among themselves not to individuals, because effective teams are made of collaborators not competitors. By giving individual rewards for contributions to the team it reduces how effective the team behavior is.
For example, if a particular team is giving certain rights over others, there may begin to exist a competitive spirit amongst the team.
