Answer:
+9-22=-13
Step-by-step explanation:
Its 13 yrds lost
The last one is always so. "People will elect Trump by a narrow margin based on a sample of 10000 people with a % error of 2%" is a typical statement.
A probability experiment will always count the number of times an event occurs. That's the whole point of an experimental probability. How many people respond favorably to a new Cancer Treatment is a typical question asked by someone conducting an experiment in probability.
C is kind of iffy. Perhaps it is too expensive, or it takes place over too long a period. Ideally repeat trials should take place whenever possible. Bone Marrow Transplants are very expensive because of the strict isolation conditions. You're likely only to get one study done this, especially initially. To check to see if Cancer is a generational thing would be an example of a study that takes too long to repeat many times.
B is simply not true. They are not the same. What theoretical model would you use to mimic a survey? You actually have to go do the survey.
A is wrong. It is the other way around.
Answer C is a maybe but check it. D and E are both true.
Answer:
81
Step-by-step explanation:
(Refer to image)
Plug in x and z and follow order of operations to simplify the expression
Answer:
it looses 200 in value for the first year
Step-by-step explanation:
I am in middle school first year.I have no idea how to solve this but i hope it helps
Answer:
See below
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>Part A</u>
A vertical stretch takes place when 
given that 
<u>Part B</u>
A vertical compression takes place when given that 
<u>Part C</u>
A vertical stretch is different than a horizontal compression:
- In a vertical stretch, the input stays the same, but the output is multiplied by the scale factor
- In a horizontal compression, the output stays the same, but the input is multiplied by the scale factor
<u>Part D</u>
A reflection across the x-axis means that the output, our y-variable, is the opposite sign. This means that all values of 
must be negative such that as mentioned in parts A and B. Also, in part C, since our scale factor is negative, the output is the only one being multiplied by the scale factor.
