The statements accurately describe key compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention in 1787 :
The Three-Fifths Compromise established that the population of enslaved people in a state would be only partially represented in that state’s official population.
The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, established that Congress would be composed of one house in which representation was based on a state’s size and one in which every state was represented equally.
Option : B and C.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Constitutional Convention is a major event that took place in 1787. It decided that how America will be governed in future days. Moreover, it ratified by all the 13 states and resulted in three major compromises. They are Three-Fifths compromise, Great compromise, and Electoral College.
Firstly, the Great compromise ended the issue between the states regarding the representation of members in both houses.
Secondly, the Three-Fifths made the enslaved person's representation to be calculated as three-fifths of the white person in the House of representatives.
Finally, the electoral college resolved how the president can be elected.
Extends the tap-and-trace provisions of existing wiretap statutes to the Internet, and mandates certain technological modifications at ISPs to facilitate electronic wiretaps on the Internet
.
Option A
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
After the fall out of terrorist attacks on September 11 2001 American congress has passed the USA Patriot Act to protect the American society from the attack of terrorism.
This act specifically allows the federal agency officials to have control over the internet communication and they can intercept the local and foreign calls which are called tap and trace.
The purpose of tap and trace of calls is for collecting the information about the terrorist activities and also for foreign intelligence.
I would say possible. That is the best answer.
Answer: Rule; Issue; Analysis
Explanation:
Legal reasoning refers to a method of thought whereby legal rules are applied to specific interactions.
When the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. From this analysis, a (rule) can be made as to whether or not the (issue) applies to the (analysis).
