<u>Broad Context:</u> The "Big Picture" is that the US is trying to annex the Republic of Texas as part of their states, and that Texas already <em>shared many common traits </em>(why? part) with the US, and should join as a state of their choosing, (which means slave or free) (How? part).
<u>Other Context:<em> </em></u><em> </em>The adding of Texas into the US (eventually as a slave state) offsetted the balance between the slaves and free states, and so California (gained after the Mexican-American War) was turned into a free state. Texas was the cause of the Texas Revolution & later on the (already named) Mexican-American War. The adding of Texas, and later the Gadsen Purchase, help create today's US southern border that is shared with Mexico.
hope this helps
The Warren Court typically made decisions that bolstered the privileges of needy individuals, minorities, or other burdened gatherings. Both Kennedy and Johnson attempted to enhance life in the United States by diminishing neediness and advancing sexual orientation and racial correspondence. The Warren Court bolstered and mirrored these strategies by including similar gatherings, settling on the court choices and the social arrangements cooperate.
Answer: Short-run changes in the growth of GDP contracts, between recessionsat the end of a recession two consecutive quarters of negative growth in real GDP positively correlated and negatively correlated
Explanation:
C) While European immigrants tended to migrate to the East Coast of the U.S., Asian immigrants tended to migrate to the West Coast of the United States is the statement which is true. This happened purely for geographical purposes, Asia was closest to the West Coast, with many Chinese immigrants settling in California, and Europe was closes to the East Coast, with many Germans and Irish people settling in New York and Boston, respectively.
Because it was To get more land to get more ressources that's why countries get involved in wars
