1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
s2008m [1.1K]
3 years ago
8

How did the relationship between Parliament and the Restoration monarchs, Charles II and James II, change following the English

Civil War? The monarchs respected Parliament’s limits on their power. The monarchs succeeded in increasing their power at the expense of Parliament. The monarchs continued to challenge Parliament's authority. The monarchs generally deferred to Parliament when there was a disagreement.
Business
2 answers:
romanna [79]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

The monarchs continued to challenge Parliament's authority.

Explanation:

Tatiana [17]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The monarchs continued to challenge Parliament's authority.

Explanation:

Following the English Civil War, tensions between the monarchs and Parliament began to grow. Queen Elizabeth did not leave any heir, therefore, James I began the Stuart Dynasty. James I believed in Divine Rule, which was in oppose of Queen Elizabeth's rule who worked with Parliament.

After the English Civil War, the monarchs continues to challenge Parliament's authority. During Restoration monarchs, Charles II and James II, Parliament and monarchs were in conflict with each other.

Therefore, option C is correct.

You might be interested in
Irish Corporation issued (sold) 15,000 shares of common stock for $65 per share. The bylaws established a stated value of $5 per
Orlov [11]

Answer:

the amount of increase in the common stock is $75,000

Explanation:

The computation of the amount of increase in the common stock is shown below;

= Number of shares of common stock sold × stated value per share

= 15,000 shares × $5 per share

= $75,000

Hence, the amount of increase in the common stock is $75,000

3 0
3 years ago
ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is <u>$16,000</u>, and your total cost of a year of college is <u>$48,000</u> per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually <u>more </u>than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college <u>gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.</u>

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0
3 years ago
Should a firm change its positioning depending on the market? What are the potential advantages and disadvantages of doing this?
nasty-shy [4]

Answer:

In simple words, In comparison to competitors, market positioning refers to the capacity to impact customer perceptions of a brand or commodity. The purpose of market placement is to establish a brand's or product's image or character so that people view it with a certain aim in mind.

Effective sales promotion has the best characteristic of being able to provide a competitive edge. As a result, if a corporation can position its services as particularly important, competitors will believe it will be difficult to make a strong case for acquiring alternatives.

4 0
3 years ago
An agreement to purchase goods and services with a specified percentage of proceeds from an original sale in that country from a
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

B)an offset.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
The market value of​ Fords' equity, preferred​ stock, and debt are $ 7 ​billion, $ 2 ​billion, and $ 13 ​billion, respectively.
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

WACC is 9%

Explanation:

WACC is the average cost of capital of the firm based on the weightage of the debt and weightage of the equity multiplied to their respective costs.

According to WACC formula

WACC = ( Cost of equity x Weightage of equity ) + ( Cost of debt ( 1- t) x Weightage of debt ) + ( Cost of Preferred equity x Weightage of Preferred equity )

As per given data

Market Values

Equity = $7 ​billion,

Preferred​ stock = $2 ​billion

Debt = $13 ​billion

Cost

Equity

Capital asset pricing model measure the expected return on an asset or investment. it is considered as the cost of common stock.

Formula for CAPM

Cost of Equity = Risk free rate + beta ( market return - risk free rate )

Cost of Equity = Rf + β ( Mrp )

Cost of Equity = 3% + 1.6 ( 8% ) = 15.8%

Preferred​ stock = $2 / $26 = 0.077 = 7.7%

Debt = 8%

Placing values in the formula

WACC = ( 15.8% x $7 billion / $22 billion ) + ( 8% ( 1- 0.3) x $13 billion / $22 billion ) + ( 7.7% x $2 billion / $22 billion )

WACC = 5.03% + 3.31% + 0.7% = 9.04%

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Company ABA showed its customers products with various combinations of features and attributes, with price being one of them. It
    10·2 answers
  • Starbucks ceo howard schultz has made sure his employees have health insurance and work in a positive environment. he could best
    8·1 answer
  • A dealer purchased a car for $19,500 and marked it up 15%. What is the sticker price of the car?
    10·2 answers
  • The law of comparative advantage indicates that if a group of individuals wants to maximize their joint output, then each good s
    9·1 answer
  • A Not-for-Profit Organization
    15·1 answer
  • Assume the total cost of a college education will be $300,000 when your child enters college in 18 years. You presently have $57
    11·1 answer
  • Which is the preferred strategy when a company's competitive advantage is based on technology and the company wishes to enter th
    8·1 answer
  • There are 72,922 seats in Lambeau Field where the Green Bay Packers play football. The Packers have sold out their season ticket
    11·1 answer
  • Other things held constant, following an increase in the effective tax rate on capital, the real interest rate _____ and desired
    5·1 answer
  • Milan Company issued bonds with a face value of $200,000 on January 1, 2018. The bonds had a 7 percent stated rate of interest a
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!