Persian your third answer
Both were famous abolitionist in the U.S. although Garrison was white and Douglass was black. They <span>were also close friends and co-workers in the American Anti-Slavery Society up till 1850 when bills for the Compromise were passed.
Garrison to Douglass: with California joining as a free state, we may soon have sufficient support to overturn the Constitution and write a new one. I hope it will be done in a peaceful manner though.
Douglass to Garrison: the founding fathers did not see slavery as a long term phenomenon here; just as Washington DC is ending the slave trade now. We do not need a new Constitution but there may be conflicts when slavery is abolished.
</span><span>
</span>
The part of China that Japan invaded in 1931 was known as "Manchuria," and they did this mostly in order to gain precious natural resources that they greatly lacked.
A president should do good to both the parties of the negotiation, goals should be met and should come to an end where one country over powers the other.
<u>Explanation:</u>
While negotiating a treaty, the President of a country should make sure that all the purpose for which the treaty has been signed should be made met. When one country over powers the other, the treaty should not be signed. It should do good for the development of the country and to the citizens of the country.
