Answer:
Dred Scott v Sanford
Explanation:
In <u>Dred Scott v Sanford</u>, the Supreme Court justices determined that slaves were property and therefore had no legal rights.
In the Dred Scott v Sanford case, Dred Scott a black American who had lived an a territory were slavery had been banned sued for his freedom arguing that since he had lived in illinois and Wisconsin, both free territory, he was a free man. However, the court ruled that he was still a slave, the Supreme court corroborated the ruling of the lesser court that he was still a slave and therefore had no legal right and cannot sue.
Answer: This is just a guess but maybe like if you have like thermal vision I guess-
There is no single definition of the word restaurant because there are many different types of restaurants. Some people consider a restaurant simply an eating establishment, while others do not consider fast food or take out “restaurants” because the person is not sitting down and eating in the establishment. This is why it is hard to pinpoint one single definition of restaurant. One can say a restaurant is a casual dining restaurant. Others can say it is a fancy restaurant or a fine dining restaurant. Some may consider Burger King a restaurant while others do not think Burger King fits the definition. Restaurants can be put in specific categories, but there will never be a single definition of the word because it is a word that needs more classification than just one single definition.
Answer:
Answer. The division of power between the Central and State Governments is done in a three fold distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the State Governments. There are three lists - Union List, State List and Concurrent List. The State Governments alone can make laws and decisions on these areas.
Explanation:
Answer:
Use value.
Explanation:
According to sociologists, Joe Feagin and Robert Parker (1990), use value is the utility of space, land, and buildings for everyday life, family life, and neighborhood life.
These notable sociologists posits that in political economy models of urban growth, there are two main features;
1. Urban growth pattern is affected by economic and political factors, which eventually cause urban growth to decline: this factors include workers, land, capital investments, government policies, property rights etc.
2. Urban space comprises of both exchange and use value: this ultimately implies that land has purposes with respect to the choice made by various individuals in the low or middle classes in a society. They argued, use value of land is to make profit and not necessarily to add value or benefit the society.
