Answer:
Hi Basically they were used as shelters here is something I had in one of my lessons
Explanation:
Trenches provided protection from bullets and shells, but they did carry their own risks. Trench foot, trench fever, dysentery, and cholera could inflict casualties as readily as any enemy.
Answer:
B. By the mid 1960s, the gang menace seemed to have peaked.
Explanation:
The statement chosen is incorrect because the the 1960s, the ganga menace did not peak but decreased almost disappearing. There are a couples of factors explaining this decrease: gang-control programs became more effective as police members infiltrated gangs and arrested leaders, also many gang leaders got involved in political and social issues and used their resources to fight against inequality and war, also some gang members were drafted for war, and finally it is also thought that gang members got addicted to heavy drugs and were unable to continue their harmful gang lifestyle.
Answer:
Explanation:
Era of Good Feelings, also called Era of Good Feeling, national mood of the United States from 1815 to 1825, as first described by the Boston Columbian Centinel on July 12, 1817. Although the “era” generally is considered coextensive with President James Monroe’s two terms (1817–25), it really began in 1815, when for the first time, thanks to the ending of the Napoleonic Wars, American citizens could afford to pay less attention to European political and military affairs. The predominant attitude was what in the 20th century became known as isolationism. The good feelings, perhaps better termed complacency, were stimulated by two events of 1816, during the last year of the presidency of James Madison: the enactment of the first U.S. avowedly protective tariff and the establishment of the second National Bank. With the decline of the Federalists the United States was, in practice if not in theory, a one-party state on the national level; heading the Democratic-Republicans, Monroe secured all but one electoral vote in 1820. Sectionalism was in comparative abeyance, replaced by a rather unassertive nationalism. But by 1820 a longer era of conflict might have been foretold; varying sectional interests, particularly regarding slavery and expansion, developed during Monroe’s second term. The “era” proved to be a temporary lull in personal and political leadership clashes while new issues were emerging.
It is now know as Medina hope this helps
