Answer:
B
Explanation:
this is about the nomination of Robert Bork as a justice of the Supreme Court. Supreme Court picks are nominated by the president, but must reach approval from a vote in congress, meaning they are a presidential appointment.
With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
It is easier to win monetary damages than a criminal conviction because the consequences of a crime is much severe than a monetary damage, the punishment differ when it comes between criminal and civil cases.
<u>Explanation:</u>
There is a massive difference between a crime and civil, a criminal case is a cause that affects the state, authorities as well as the public, like murdering a person, whereas a monetary damage affects the individual that was affected but not the state.
It is easier to win monetary damages than a criminal conviction because the consequences of a crime is much severe than a monetary damage, the punishment differ when it comes between criminal and civil cases.
A criminal conviction is persecuted by the state and even given imprisonment for years, whereas the punishment given for a monetary damage as much less consequences than criminal conviction.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
The physical presence of an out-of-state party in a particular state meets the required minimum contacts prerequisites and establishes personal jurisdiction.
Answer:
D) Anti-Prostitution Unit
Explanation:
a department or division of a police force that enforces laws against prostitution, drug abuse, illegal gambling, etc.