1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Gnom [1K]
3 years ago
15

Is it illegal to hold a protest on school grounds while school is in session

Law
2 answers:
hammer [34]3 years ago
7 0
I don’t think so,my class went on strike whilst others were in class
denis23 [38]3 years ago
3 0

Answer: I'm pretty sure it is, I mean it also depends what kinda protest it is too yknow? but I would say yeah since its disruptive and would distract the students and they would yell at them for being on school grounds and it would be even worse if they refuse to leave which would result in calling the police....

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The estimated economic cost of alcohol-impaired-driving crashes in the United States in 2010 (the most recent year for which cos
den301095 [7]

Answer:

$44 billion.

Explanation:

Alcohol-impaired-driving crashes are automobile crashes caused as a result of a driver driving under the influence of alcohol, especially when he exceeds the daily allowed average, BAC (Blood Alcohol Concentration), which is 0.8g/deciliter.

This implies that it is illegal and a punishable offense for a driver of any kind of motor vehicle to continue driving when his blood alcohol concentration is above the allowed limit.

3 0
4 years ago
According to NHTSA, in 2018 there was an alcohol-impaired fatality every….
scZoUnD [109]

Answer:

50 minutes.

Explanation:

2018 NHTSA key findings:

■ In 2018 there were 10,511 fatalities in motor vehicle traffic crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher. This totaled 29 percent of all traffic fatalities for the year. (Note: It is illegal in every State to

drive with a BAC of .08 g/dL or higher.)

■ An average of 1 alcohol-impaired-driving fatality occurred every 50 minutes in 2018.

■ The estimated economic cost of all alcohol-impaired crashes (involving alcoholimpaired drivers or alcohol-impaired nonoccupants) in the United States in 2010 (the most recent year for which cost data is available) was $44 billion.

■ Of the 2018 traffic fatalities among children 14 and younger, 22 percent occurred in alcohol-impaired-driving crashes.

■ The 21- to 24-year-old age group had the highest percentage (27%) of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes compared to other age groups in 2018.

■ The percentage of drivers with BACs of .08 g/dL or higher in fatal crashes in 2018 was highest for motorcycle riders (25%), compared to drivers of passenger cars (21%), light trucks (19%), and large trucks (3%).

■ The rate of alcohol impairment among drivers involved in fatal crashes in 2018 was 3.4 times higher at night than during the day.

■ In 2018 among the 10,511 alcohol-impaired driving fatalities, 67 percent (7,051) were in crashes in which at least one driver had a BAC of .15 g/dL or higher.

Source: NHTSA 2018 data

Hope that helps

6 0
2 years ago
One positive outcome of gangs in prison is .
ss7ja [257]

Answer:b

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Suzy loaded her .38 caliber pistol, snuck out the back door, and, unknown to Bob, with finger on the trigger aimed directly at h
Rudik [331]

Answer:

Suzy is expected to be charged with attempted murder.

Explanation:

Suzy showed a strong intention to kill her husband, even though her plan failed and she was unable to actually kill her. For this reason, she should be charged with attempted murder and since there is direct evidence that she wanted to kill Bob, it is likely that she would be convicted, even without actually carrying out the crime.

This accusation would be prevalent, even if Suzi had not caused Bob any injuries or injuries.

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A state legislator wants to amend the Articles of Confederation. How many states would have to agree in order for the amendment
    7·1 answer
  • 1.Each state has its own constitution, separate from the United States Constitution. What do you think States would include in t
    5·1 answer
  • Question 1. Who are the two major parties in the U.K. ?
    13·1 answer
  • You are driving in traffic on a road with two or more lanes in each direction. You should A: Avoid driving in someone else's bli
    5·1 answer
  • Anybody gonna see joker with a trenchcoat and le ak forti seven?
    12·2 answers
  • An arrow signal with a left-pointing arrow _____.
    13·1 answer
  • Article 3 of the Constitution outlines the
    7·1 answer
  • Gvfldccfklddfñdfvdfñdfñbggkmfdvdboivbc
    14·1 answer
  • The boys are annoying and they make my blood boil.
    9·2 answers
  • Which hate crime category is most likely to result in murder?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!