1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dafna11 [192]
2 years ago
12

When one party promises to do what she is already legally obligated to do, the law considers this a(n)_______ and not valid cons

ideration.
Law
1 answer:
Pie2 years ago
6 0

When one party promises to do what she is already legally obligated to do, the law considers this a <u>preexisting duty</u> and not valid consideration.

<h3>What is a valid consideration?</h3>

A valid consideration is a price paid in exchange for goods or services or a promise to do (or abstain from) something.

A valid consideration must be significant, adequate, and unconditional.

Thus, when one party promises to do what she is already legally obligated to do, the law considers this a <u>preexisting duty</u> and not valid consideration.

Learn more about valid considerations at brainly.com/question/1387188 and brainly.com/question/1697686

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Which of the following correctly describes the actions taken in the process represented by section J?
mixas84 [53]

Answer:

maybe the answer would be d

4 0
3 years ago
7. Which of these rights has not been subject to
fomenos

Answer:

你是一個現實生活中的白痴im jp愛你的男人

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Briefly explain peremptory challenges?​
timurjin [86]
A peremptory challenge is used by attorneys in the jury selection process to excuse potential jurors without providing a reason why. In this lesson you will learn about the use of peremptory strikes, as well as the laws designed to protect the integrity of the process.
While the process of selecting jurors may be too boring to be featured in popular T.V. crime dramas, any seasoned trial attorney will tell you that a trial can be lost or won in jury selection. So, what exactly makes the process so important? And how do attorneys pick the 'best' jury for each case?

The jury selection process, also know as 'voir dire', involves attorneys from each side taking turns picking the jurors they believe will favor their position over their opponent's. The term peremptory challenge refers to the practice of excusing potential jurors without providing a reason why. Jurors may also be excluded because the attorneys and the judge believe that the juror, for whatever reason, can't be fair. This is called a 'for cause' challenge.

6 0
3 years ago
What are 3 useful questions to ask when drafting a law?
nevsk [136]
1. what are the clients business purpose and objectives?
2. what are the structure and operations of the deal?
3. who will likely use the document going forward?
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The standards of proof in a civil case is “beyond reasonable doubt” true or false
laiz [17]
In criminal cases, the government's proof must be more powerful than that. It must be beyond a reasonable doubt. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that leaves you firmly convinced of the defendant's guilt.
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Describe an alternative program(s) a person with a disability can apply for if they don’t qualify for SSDI.
    5·1 answer
  • The fifth amendment protects citizens against self-incrimination
    11·2 answers
  • Please help me by answering !
    9·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram ( brown v. Board of education) ( Hernandez v. Texas) HELP
    13·1 answer
  • 1 delegated power that Congress has and give me an example of how congress can use it.
    15·1 answer
  • What is classical criminology
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following takes place
    6·1 answer
  • H e l p pleaseeee is due in 30 min
    15·1 answer
  • When a product fails to perform as warranted, this is called a) contractual liability. O b) product malfunction. c) malicious ma
    10·1 answer
  • Which landmark court case stated that juveniles had the right to a hearing before having their cases transferred to adult court
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!