Answer: The answer is provided below
Explanation:
The four liabilities of incoming and outgoing partners are:
1. person who is admitted as a partner to an existing firm apart from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by that particular admission alone become liable for anything which is done before the person becomes a partner.
2. A person admitted as a general partner into a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership that already exists does not by the admission alone become liable for things done before the individual became a general partner.
3. A partner who retires from a firm other than limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the partnership debts and the obligations that were incurred before the retirement of the partner.
4. A partner who retires from a limited partnership or an incorporated limited partnership
doesn't by the retirement alone cease to be liable for the liabilities of the firm that were incurred before the retirement of the partner for which the partner were liable.
Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.
Explanation:
The advantage of insanity defense is that the accused could avoid penalized with death, even if he is guilty. In the context of crime the sentence is very convenient as compared with an accused who is proven to be guilty, but it is not proven.
The insanity defense is rarely used because of the difficulty in providing legal insanity. Many criminal defendants suffer from mental illness and produce evidence of this illness such as psychiatric testimony.
Hence, Domestic violence is the standard used for insanity defense to produce good result because it changes person completely and Doing the same thing over and over again expecting a change but never changing anything is the standard used for least use of insanity defense.
A peremptory challenge is used by attorneys in the jury selection process to excuse potential jurors without providing a reason why. In this lesson you will learn about the use of peremptory strikes, as well as the laws designed to protect the integrity of the process.
While the process of selecting jurors may be too boring to be featured in popular T.V. crime dramas, any seasoned trial attorney will tell you that a trial can be lost or won in jury selection. So, what exactly makes the process so important? And how do attorneys pick the 'best' jury for each case?
The jury selection process, also know as 'voir dire', involves attorneys from each side taking turns picking the jurors they believe will favor their position over their opponent's. The term peremptory challenge refers to the practice of excusing potential jurors without providing a reason why. Jurors may also be excluded because the attorneys and the judge believe that the juror, for whatever reason, can't be fair. This is called a 'for cause' challenge.
In this example, the judge is asked to decide what the appropriate disposition is for Trey's case. Disposition orders for juveniles usually fall within two categories: incarceration and non-incarceration. When it comes to non-incarceration options, probation is usually the most common one. We know that Trey was already on probation for burglary. Therefore, it is likely that probation is not a strategy that works with him and that he needs a harsher sentence.
The least serious incarceration sentence is house arrest. However, we know that Trey's father is a single father and is unable to spend time with Trey. Therefore, this would not be beneficial for them. Therefore, I would recommend that Trey is temporarily held at a juvenile hall or a juvenile detention facility, most likely followed by a period of probation.
