<h2><em>Explanation:</em></h2><h2><em>Explanation:A stop-and-frisk refers to a brief non-intrusive police stop of a suspect. The Fourth Amendment requires that before stopping the suspect, the police must have a reasonable suspicion that a crime has been, is being, or is about to be committed by the suspect. If the police reasonably suspect that the suspect is armed and dangerous, the police may frisk the suspect, meaning that the police will give a quick pat-down of the suspect's outer clothing. The frisk is also called a Terry Stop, derived from the Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968). Terry held that a stop-and-frisk must comply with the Fourth Amendment, meaning that the stop-and-frisk cannot be unreasonable. According to the Terry court, a reasonable stop-and-frisk is one "in which a reasonably prudent officer is warranted in the circumstances of a given case in believing that his safety or that of others is endangered, he may make a reasonable search for weapons of the person believed by him to be armed and dangerous." Stop-and-frisks fall under criminal law, as opposed to civil law.</em></h2><h2 />
Answer: False
Explanation: Alternate dispute resolution method that is used for settling any dispute or problem outside the court without trial .The most common used processes for resolving the dispute are arbitration, collaborative law,mediation , conciliation etc.
Iitigation is defined as the method in which the legal concern is present thus, this method is not used outside the courtroom for ADR. Therefore, the statement given in the question is false.
The correct answer would be D
