1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Darina [25.2K]
3 years ago
9

Please help if you answer it i will give you brainliest

History
2 answers:
Dimas [21]3 years ago
4 0
No. The amendments are all important for different reasons. Though some apply more to today’s day and age, each have their own purpose.
Andrej [43]3 years ago
3 0
No because they are all the same! Glad I can help
You might be interested in
Jefferson had reservations about buying Louisiana because
Aloiza [94]
A.

He thought it was unconstitutional for the government to make an uncharted purchase or something similar to that.
5 0
2 years ago
Quand le premier président des États-Unis est-il décédé?
Nitella [24]

December 14, 1799 monsieur

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What was an important difference between Edison‘s inventions and those dire industrial technologies after civil war?
allsm [11]

An important difference between Edison‘s inventions and those dire industrial technologies after the civil war was Edison's early inventions did not favour mass production of goods.

<u>Explanation: </u>

The emergence of urgency for new industrial technologies resulted in the invention of many crucial machines and devices. These technologically advanced machines proved beneficial in undertaking mass production of commodities.

The early inventions of Thomas Alva Edison were not relevant to the contemporary need of the industry as the inventions were that of the phonograph and the incandescent bulb.

8 0
3 years ago
Which rules were set down in the english bill of rights
DaniilM [7]
Do you need to know why the bill of rights was written ? .
4 0
3 years ago
Many other Americans have followed Carnegie’s lead and done the same thing, for example
Pie

Answer:

As discussed previously, new processes in steel refining, along with inventions in the fields of communications and electricity, transformed the business landscape of the nineteenth century. The exploitation of these new technologies provided opportunities for tremendous growth, and business entrepreneurs with financial backing and the right mix of business acumen and ambition could make their fortunes. Some of these new millionaires were known in their day as robber barons, a negative term that connoted the belief that they exploited workers and bent laws to succeed. Regardless of how they were perceived, these businessmen and the companies they created revolutionized American industry.

RAILROADS AND ROBBER BARONS

Earlier in the nineteenth century, the first transcontinental railroad and subsequent spur lines paved the way for rapid and explosive railway growth, as well as stimulated growth in the iron, wood, coal, and other related industries. The railroad industry quickly became the nation’s first “big business.” A powerful, inexpensive, and consistent form of transportation, railroads accelerated the development of virtually every other industry in the country. By 1890, railroad lines covered nearly every corner of the United States, bringing raw materials to industrial factories and finished goods to consumer markets. The amount of track grew from 35,000 miles at the end of the Civil War to over 200,000 miles by the close of the century. Inventions such as car couplers, air brakes, and Pullman passenger cars allowed the volume of both freight and people to increase steadily. From 1877 to 1890, both the amount of goods and the number of passengers traveling the rails tripled.

Financing for all of this growth came through a combination of private capital and government loans and grants. Federal and state loans of cash and land grants totaled $150 million and 185 million acres of public land, respectively. Railroads also listed their stocks and bonds on the New York Stock Exchange to attract investors from both within the United States and Europe. Individual investors consolidated their power as railroads merged and companies grew in size and power. These individuals became some of the wealthiest Americans the country had ever known. Midwest farmers, angry at large railroad owners for their exploitative business practices, came to refer to them as “robber barons,” as their business dealings were frequently shady and exploitative. Among their highly questionable tactics was the practice of differential shipping rates, in which larger business enterprises received discounted rates to transport their goods, as opposed to local producers and farmers whose higher rates essentially subsidized the discounts.

Jay Gould was perhaps the first prominent railroad magnate to be tarred with the “robber baron” brush. He bought older, smaller, rundown railroads, offered minimal improvements, and then capitalized on factory owners’ desires to ship their goods on this increasingly popular and more cost-efficient form of transportation. His work with the Erie Railroad was notorious among other investors, as he drove the company to near ruin in a failed attempt to attract foreign investors during a takeover attempt. His model worked better in the American West, where the railroads were still widely scattered across the country, forcing farmers and businesses to pay whatever prices Gould demanded in order to use his trains. In addition to owning the Union Pacific Railroad that helped to construct the original transcontinental railroad line, Gould came to control over ten thousand miles of track across the United States, accounting for 15 percent of all railroad transportation. When he died in 1892, Gould had a personal worth of over $100 million, although he was a deeply unpopular figure.

In contrast to Gould’s exploitative business model, which focused on financial profit more than on tangible industrial contributions, Commodore Cornelius Vanderbilt was a “robber baron” who truly cared about the success of his railroad enterprise and its positive impact on the American economy. Vanderbilt consolidated several smaller railroad lines, called trunk lines, to create the powerful New York Central Railroad Company, one of the largest corporations in the United States at the time. He later purchased stock in the major rail lines that would connect his company to Chicago, thus expanding his reach and power while simultaneously creating a railroad network to connect Chicago to New York City. This consolidation provided more efficient connections from Midwestern suppliers to eastern markets. It was through such consolidation that, by 1900, seven major railroad tycoons controlled over 70 percent of all operating lines. Vanderbilt’s personal wealth at his death (over $100 million in 1877), placed him among the top three wealthiest individuals in American history.

6 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Louisiana Purchase
    10·2 answers
  • How did the case of marbury vs. madison in 1803 established the supreme court's power of judicial review?
    13·1 answer
  • If the soil exerts a trapezoidal distribution of load on the bottom of the footing, determine the intensities w1 and w2 of this
    12·1 answer
  • Which best explains why protecting public health is an important duty of state government?
    13·2 answers
  • Where was monarchy the form of government around 1450 BC?​
    14·1 answer
  • The economics of many west African nations are harmed by
    13·1 answer
  • Explain the extreme methods that J. McCarthy used to target communists/communism.
    5·1 answer
  • Review the chart you filled in as you read. Taken together, what
    15·1 answer
  • What was the name of the new Independent party that ex President Roosevelt and what was the name of his progressive reforms prog
    13·1 answer
  • Hello if we we were in a room alone together what would u do???? let me know
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!