Answer:
b. 7 percent
Explanation:
Benefits here means the statutory benefits that the employees have a right to receive. These on the legal terms are the requirements, as the employer is required to contribute around 7.65% of the salary paid to the employee towards benefits of social security and Medicare.
This clearly is the standard set for the payroll. Now this also provides for the minimum contributions, thus it provides that at-least these are to be made.
Thus, each employer when making a standard salary shall contribute more than 7% towards the benefits of the employees.
C. Rise stage
Because if it’s gaining popularity then it’s on the rise to being popular
Answer:
Ben would pay more in taxes.
Explanation:
A progressive income tax increases the tax rate as the taxpayer earns more money.
In this case, Ben would be taxed as earnings $60,000 which is probably a much higher tax rate than the applicable one for $30,000. If we use the current tax brackets for 2020, Ben would fall under the 22% tax bracket while both Cathy and Dylan would fall under the 12% tax bracket. Obviously Ben would pay much more in taxes.
Answer:
C. Create a rotating assignment so each team member shares note taking.
Explanation:
In the case noted in the question above, there is a situation that could be unpleasant if it were decided by some type of bias.
Therefore, the most appropriate alternative for the team to address this situation would be to create a rotating assignment for each team member to share the notes. This way it would not happen that a team member is always chosen to perform a task that causes dissatisfaction in the whole team. Creating a rotating assignment to carry out the task would guarantee the uniformity of the task assignment and avoid possible dissatisfactions, inequalities and interpersonal conflicts that could arise.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Base on the scenario been described in the question which, Darren was eligible to assist to a traditional of 401,000 in 2019, but we were told he forgot and later he paid in 15, June 2020, he is look as though he paid in 2019 because and it is true.
The reason why the answer is true is that Darren is that the time he paid the money in July 15, 2020, it was still within the time he allowed to still pay for the year 2019, that's why he considered as though he paid in 2019.
