Since the area of any thing is length time width, we can divide 4864 by 152 to get the width of the garden. This gives us 32. Now we need to add 152 + 152 + 32 + 32 to get our total feet of fencing necessary. This would give us 368 feet of fencing.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Find 15% of $33 to find the tip.
Find 1% of $33 (move the decimal over 2 places to the left. $0.33
2. Multiply the 1% tip by 15%
33 * 15 = $4.95
3. Add $33 and $4.95
4.95 + 33.00 = $37.95 total
The unknown is 2% and sorry
In the given statement above, in this case, the answer would be TRUE. It is true that the inequality x + 2y ≥ 3 is satisfied by point (1, 1). In order to prove this, we just have to plug in the values. 1 + 2(1) <span> ≥ 3
So the result is 1 + 2 </span> ≥ 3. 3 <span> ≥ 3, which makes it true, because it states that it is "more than or equal to", therefore, our answer is true. Hope this answer helps.</span>
Answer:
Yes. The data provide enough evidence to support the claim that the mean weight of one-year-old boys is greater than 25 pounds.
P-value=P(t>2.84)=0.0024
Step-by-step explanation:
Hypothesis test on the population mean.
The claim is that the mean weight of one-year-old boys is greater than 25 pounds.
Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

The significance level is α=0.05.
The sample size is n=354. The sample mean is 25.8 pounds and the sample standard deviation is 5.3 pounds. As the population standard deviation is estimated from the sample standard deviation, we will use a t-statistic.
The degrees of freedom are:

The t-statistic is:

For a right tailed test and 353 degrees of freedom, the P-value is:

As the P-value is smaller than the significance level, the effect is significant and the null hypothesis is rejected.
There is enough evidence to support the claim that the mean weight of one-year-old boys is greater than 25 pounds.