Answer:
See attached picture to view the graph
Step-by-step explanation:
Start by analyzing how this average idea works:
If only one member goes to the trip, it will cost him/her $1000+$200 = $1200.
If two members go to the trip, then they will share the cost as per the following: ($1000+ $200 + $200 = $1400) which they will be dividing into two people, thus costing each of them $700.
Notice that the general function that represents such average will be given by: 
Plot such function in the two dimensional plane, and you will get the asymptotic behavior shown in the attached image.
Given :
New York City has a population of 8.55 million and 300 square mile area .
Manhattan has 1.64 million and 23 square miles area .
To Find :
How much greater is the population density of Manhattan than New York City.
Solution :
Population density of New York City :

Now ,

Therefore , population density of Manhattan is
greater than New York City .
Hence , this is the required solution .
Answer:
26cm
Step-by-step explanation: we want a triangle with shorter sides (smaller perimeter) and we got 2 similar triangles , since triangles are similar the corresponding sides would be in ratio.
To get triangle of shorter perimeter we have to use the longest side of
△
A
B
C
put 6cm side corresponding to 12cm side.
Let
△
A
B
C
~
△
D
E
F
6cm side corresponding to 12 cm side .
therefore,
A
B
D
E
=
B
C
E
F
=
C
A
F
D
=
1
2
So the perimeter of ABC is half of the perimeter of DEF .
perimeter of DEF =
2
×
(
3
+
4
+
6
)
=
2
×
13
=
26
c
m
answer 26 cm.
Answer:
- Lower bound ⇒ 855 kg
- Upper bound ⇒ 865 kg
Step-by-step explanation:
The upper bound is the highest number that a figure can be to be rounded off to the rounded figure.
The lower bound is the lowest number that a figure can be to be rounded odd to the rounded figure.
The lower bound of 860 to the nearest 10 is;
= 855 kg
855 is the lowest figure that can be rounded up to 860.
The Upper bound is;
= 865
865 is the highest figure because no figure above this can be rounded to 860.
<em>855 kg ≤ 860 kg < 865 kg</em>
yes the answer is ratio you are correct