<span>It has a negative implication, since it proposes that the reasons used to expel the issue were not important. "The Trapped Housewife" is an expression talked about in Betty Friedan's book, "The Feminine Mystique". She discusses the issue numerous ladies looked in the 1960's tied in with being miserable with their lives at home and subsequent to perusing half of the book, I'm starting to see parallels of these issues that still holds on in show day.</span>
<u>Two different small paragraphs with formal tone and informal tone:</u>
Formal writing style is the one which describes every sentence in a very proper way. It does not makes use of contractions such as ‘it’s’, rather use ‘It is.’ When we use formal tone, there’s no space for first or third person (I,we) Example of formal tone is:
‘Over the past few years, education systems have come up with many new changes. Today’s education is no longer restricted within books. Rather, there are a wide number of applications, tutorials, and videos available online to expand and widen the knowledge of a child.’
Informal writing style is very casual. It is very much similar to how we have a conversation with our friends on a regular basis. Example if informal tone is:
‘Today, if we look around, we’ll notice that every person is engaged in some or the other social networking sites. We no longer interact with our friends and relatives face to face like we used to earlier. It’s you and me who needs to bring changes to change the present state.’
The correct answers to this question are Charles Dickens and Victor Hugo. Bret Harte wrote a parody of works of American Romanticism Charles Dickens and Victor Hugo. Thank you for posting your question. I hope that this answer helped you. Let me know if you need more help.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
because in the extract helmer said and I quote will it be any good to you
1- <span>The ancient Chinese board game “Go” is invented long before there was any writing to record its rules. A game from the impossibly distant past has now brought us closer to a moment that once seemed part of an impossibly distant future: a time when machines are cleverer than we are.
<u>Because it's an action that started and finished in the past, this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past)</u>
2- </span><span>For years, Go was considered the last redoubt against the march of computers. Machines might win at chess, draughts, Othello, three-dimensional noughts and crosses, Monopoly, bridge, and poker. Go, though, is different.
<u>This continues the same line of mistake as the first paragraph. Because it's referencing something that already happened ("Go was considered...), this should read </u><u>was</u><u> (Simple Past).</u>
The game required intuition, strategising <u>and</u> character reading, along with vast numbers of moves and permutations. According to legend, it was invented by a Chinese emperor to teach his subjects balance and patience: qualities unique to human intelligence.
<u>The conjunction and is used before the last element in a list. In this case, this word should be substituted by a comma because <em>character reading</em> is not the last element on that list.</u>
3- </span><span>This week, though, a computer called Alpha Go <u>defeats</u> the world’s best player of Go. It did so by “ learning” the game, crunching through 30 million positions from recorded matches, reacting and anticipating. It <u>evolves</u> as a player and taught itself.
That single game of Go marks a milestone on the road to the “technological singularity”, the moment when artificial intelligence becomes capable of self-improvement and learns faster than humans can control or understand.</span><span>
<u>These should read defeated ... evolved. This continues the same line of thought on subject-verb agreement. If it's talking about a past event, and the rest of the paragraph sustains that idea, then these verbs should be in Simple Past.</u></span><span>
</span>
