Answer:
A. Use concrete reinforcers even when children are intrinsically motivated to learn.
Explanation:
Concrete reinforcement is carried out by giving either reward or discouragement to motivate the children into doing a behavior that we want them to.
When children are already intrinsically motivation to learn, this type of reinforcement is no longer necessary and doing that possess the risk to actually stray the children's motivation away from learning by themselves.
"Return to normalcy" was United States presidential candidate Warren G. Harding's campaign slogan for the election of 1920. It evoked a return to the way of life before World War I, the First Red Scare, and the Spanish flu pandemic.
Answer:
Georgia's coast is among the most popular tourist attractions in the South, and also one of the most historic places in Georgia - it was along the coast where Georgia's ... Another important item to note about Georgia's coast is that it is not a static ... crisscrossed with rivers and streams, making them appear to be several small ...
Explanation:
The best explanation for the example that the fear of driving can be more easily reduced than the fear of holding snakes, can be done from the Biological Perspective.
- The biological approach examines psychological problems by looking at the physical underpinnings of both animal and human behavior.
- It is one of the main views in psychology and includes research on the neurological system, immune system, and brain.
- It follows the premise that our genetics and physiology influence our behavior.
- It is the only method of psychology that considers biological, or physical factors when analyzing ideas, feelings, and behaviors.
- Thus, everything that is psychological has a physiological foundation.
From the above it is clear that Biological Perspective is the correct answer.
Learn more about the Biological Perspective here:
brainly.com/question/686861
#SPJ4
Answer:
nature-nurture question
Explanation:
The physical characteristics of an organism are passed on to its descendants through the mechanism elucidated by Mendel, still in the nineteenth century. But what about behavior? Is behavior, especially human behavior, also subject to these mechanisms? Anyway, would our personality be the result of nature (written in DNA) or of our creation (tradition and learning)? This explains the "nature-nurture question".
If a baby were handed over for adoption by an English-speaking family and adopted by a Spanish-speaking family, you would expect the baby to learn to speak Spanish. If so, it would offer insight into the question of creating nature about what leads to an individual's behavior. In this case, we realize that in the nature x creation discussion there are no winners, for we have found that nature acts through creation.
